Drug shortages hit Lilly, Endocyte

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The nation’s shortage of certain drugs is threatening to affect research trials being conducted by Eli Lilly and Co. and Endocyte Inc.

According to Dow Jones Newswires, the cancer drug Doxil is being used in more than 30 clinical trials of new cancer medicines, but its manufacturer, New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson, has halted supplies to clinical trials in order to make sure current patients get the drug.

About 2,500 patients are on a waiting list to receive the drug, Johnson told Dow Jones. Johnson’s U.S. sales of Doxil fell 87 percent in the third quarter as a result of the shortage, which Johnson blamed on equipment failures at its supplier, Ben Venue Laboratories.

Amy Sousa, a spokeswoman for Indianapolis-based Lilly, said an early-stage study combining Doxil with Lilly's experimental drug tasisulam for the treatment of ovarian cancer isn't currently treating patients due to the shortage.

West Lafayette-based Endocyte has warned that if the Doxil shortage lasts an extended period of time, it could delay a clinical trial testing a combination of its lead experimental compound, EC145, and Doxil in ovarian cancer.

Endocyte spokeswoman Martina Schwarzkopf told Dow Jones the company was ahead of its enrollment plan when the shortage was announced, helping it avoid a hiccup so far.

Other trials being conducted for Calfironia-based Amgen Inc., New Jersey-based Celgene Corp., as well as some university-sponsored studies, also have been affected by the Doxil shortage.

At least 300 clinical trials funded by the National Cancer Institute include a drug that is in short supply, a Department of Health and Human Services official told a congressional committee last month. The shortages have many causes, including stricter price limits from the federal Medicare program, industry consolidation and manufacturing-quality problems.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1