IBJNews

Endowment pledges $63M toward fight against brain drain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Lilly Endowment will announce on Thursday nearly $63 million in grants to Indiana’s colleges to combat brain drain among their graduates.

It’s the third round of grants over the past decade that are part of what the endowment calls its Initiative to Promote Opportunities Through Educational Collaborations. In two previous rounds, the endowment granted $57 million to Indiana colleges and universities.

And while the Indianapolis-based foundation acknowledged that there has been progress during that time, it wants to see more.

“Despite a steady supply of four-year college graduates, Indiana ranks very low among the states in the percentage of its adult working-age population that has a bachelor’s degree, and the state’s average per-capita income ranking also is unacceptable,” said Sara Cobb, the Lilly Endowment’s vice president for education, in a prepared statement.

Indeed, just 25 percent of Hoosiers between the ages of 25 and 64 hold at least a bachelor’s degree, according to Census data, compared with a national rate of 30 percent. And Indiana’s per-capita income has been on a 50-year slide, so that the average Hoosier now earns 85 cents for every dollar earned by the average American.

Indiana already does better than most states at holding on to its college graduates, according to an IBJ analysis of surveys of college graduates across the country. Where Indiana lags the rest of the country is on its ability to attract educated adults, according to census data.

Those findings led Ball State University economist Mike Hicks to question the endowment's brain-drain grants and other similarly focused efforts.

“The brain-drain efforts in Indiana have largely identified the wrong target and applied a lot of resources to it,” Hicks said in a September interview. “The problem lies not in how many people we’re educating or how we’re educating them, but in having places that they want to live."

But there is also evidence that Indiana’s business sector is not producing enough jobs in industry sectors that demand workers with bachelor’s degrees, especially those with degrees in science, technology, engineering and math.

According to a 2013 study conducted by Ohio-based consulting firm Battelle and funded by the endowment, Indiana has a deficit in almost all “traded-sector” industries that serve national or global markets.

“Across nearly all high-skilled occupations critical to traded sector industries, Indiana is either growing slower or declining faster than the U.S. average,” the study concluded. “This is a clear indication of the weakness in demand for high-skilled occupations appropriate for bachelor’s-and-above college graduates found in Indiana.”

The endowment provided funding last year to help universities review the Battelle study and propose new ideas to further improve job prospects for their graduates. Those proposals have now resulted in the new round of grant funding, which will send $62.7 million to 39 colleges and universities.

The endowment determined the size of its grants based on the enrollment at each college or university.

The largest grants, of $5 million each, went to Indiana University and Purdue University, the state’s publicly-funded research universities, which are both trying to produce more innovations that can be turned into job-producing companies in Indiana.

Ivy Tech Community College, which is trying to fill a gap in Indiana of so-called middle-skill workers, will receive nearly $4.9 million.

Grants of $3 million each will go the University of Notre Dame, Ball State University, Indiana State University, Indiana Wesleyan University, the University of Southern Indiana and Vincennes University.

Most other schools received awards of roughly $1 million each.

“We are encouraged by the variety of thoughtful programs that colleges and universities proposed,” Cobb stated. “These activities have the potential to increase significantly the number of Indiana college graduates who find satisfying opportunities in the state.”

Nearly all the colleges will use the money to expand internships and experiential learning opportunities for students, the endowment said.

More than 75 percent of the schools will expand their career development programs and try to move them earlier in students’ college experiences.

More than two-thirds of the schools plan to alter their courses to better fit employers’ needs. Nearly half of those schools will create programs specifically focused on entrepreneurship. And 10 colleges will create new degree programs aimed at employer needs.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • wrong problem
    hicks says: “The problem lies not in how many people we’re educating or how we’re educating them, but in having places that they want to live." but that's not exactly the problem. Consider this as the problem and see if you can make changes: the problem is the lifestyle they want liveat there are not enough jobs to afford them the lifestyle they want to live. i know how to fix this. There might be more than one way. -shu
  • Truth
    “The brain-drain efforts in Indiana have largely identified the wrong target and applied a lot of resources to it,” Hicks said in a September interview. “The problem lies not in how many people we’re educating or how we’re educating them, but in having places that they want to live." That says it all. There are neat areas of Indy and surrounding metros, but they pale in comparison to other cities that attract young people with outdoor activities, culture, and good weather. Indy is good for raising a family and low cost of living, but other than that, you are not offering a lot of attractive options compared to mountains, coasts, culture, diversity, open minded individuals.
  • simple
    Here's a cheap way to stop the brain drain. Have the legislature stop focusing on gay marriage and controlling women's bodies!!!
  • Indiana's Reality
    Subsidized education is great for the state budget as it allows the state to reduce it's "contribution" to cost of education, but education does not retain people upon graduation. The state worships at the alter of low taxes, but the high quality/high paying jobs we really want to attract are more dependent on quality of life and public/private amenities and reputation than low taxes. Cincinnati probably has more corporate headquarters than all of Indiana.
  • Lilly Foundation Philanthropy
    Here's a link to the Foundation's awards list - Hoosiers have been fortunate to have Lilly Foundation leadership and awards to counter the Legislature's abandonment of its responsibilities to support education in Indiana (I guess that's why I live in Virginia now?) Well done to Lilly and other philanthropies - scroll through their website to see the millions distributed to colleges and religious groups across the U.S. Shame on the Indiana legislature for using this philanthropy to abrogate their stewardship of Indiana taxpayer money away from education to the pockets of campaign contributors. http://www.lillyendowment.org/pdf/EducationalCollaboration.pdf
  • Brain drain reality
    It's pretty easy to figure out, when you put an emphasis on hospitality and warehousing, you end up with relatively low-paying hospitality and warehouse jobs. Swing and a miss on the IT, and high-tech sectors, which is why places like Seattle have construction cranes dotting the skyline, increasing income, and rising property values.
  • DUH
    Once the state generously funded "state Supported Universities". Now we have "state Assisted Universities", and the brains are going elsewhere.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT