IBJNews

Endowment pledges $63M toward fight against brain drain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Lilly Endowment will announce on Thursday nearly $63 million in grants to Indiana’s colleges to combat brain drain among their graduates.

It’s the third round of grants over the past decade that are part of what the endowment calls its Initiative to Promote Opportunities Through Educational Collaborations. In two previous rounds, the endowment granted $57 million to Indiana colleges and universities.

And while the Indianapolis-based foundation acknowledged that there has been progress during that time, it wants to see more.

“Despite a steady supply of four-year college graduates, Indiana ranks very low among the states in the percentage of its adult working-age population that has a bachelor’s degree, and the state’s average per-capita income ranking also is unacceptable,” said Sara Cobb, the Lilly Endowment’s vice president for education, in a prepared statement.

Indeed, just 25 percent of Hoosiers between the ages of 25 and 64 hold at least a bachelor’s degree, according to Census data, compared with a national rate of 30 percent. And Indiana’s per-capita income has been on a 50-year slide, so that the average Hoosier now earns 85 cents for every dollar earned by the average American.

Indiana already does better than most states at holding on to its college graduates, according to an IBJ analysis of surveys of college graduates across the country. Where Indiana lags the rest of the country is on its ability to attract educated adults, according to census data.

Those findings led Ball State University economist Mike Hicks to question the endowment's brain-drain grants and other similarly focused efforts.

“The brain-drain efforts in Indiana have largely identified the wrong target and applied a lot of resources to it,” Hicks said in a September interview. “The problem lies not in how many people we’re educating or how we’re educating them, but in having places that they want to live."

But there is also evidence that Indiana’s business sector is not producing enough jobs in industry sectors that demand workers with bachelor’s degrees, especially those with degrees in science, technology, engineering and math.

According to a 2013 study conducted by Ohio-based consulting firm Battelle and funded by the endowment, Indiana has a deficit in almost all “traded-sector” industries that serve national or global markets.

“Across nearly all high-skilled occupations critical to traded sector industries, Indiana is either growing slower or declining faster than the U.S. average,” the study concluded. “This is a clear indication of the weakness in demand for high-skilled occupations appropriate for bachelor’s-and-above college graduates found in Indiana.”

The endowment provided funding last year to help universities review the Battelle study and propose new ideas to further improve job prospects for their graduates. Those proposals have now resulted in the new round of grant funding, which will send $62.7 million to 39 colleges and universities.

The endowment determined the size of its grants based on the enrollment at each college or university.

The largest grants, of $5 million each, went to Indiana University and Purdue University, the state’s publicly-funded research universities, which are both trying to produce more innovations that can be turned into job-producing companies in Indiana.

Ivy Tech Community College, which is trying to fill a gap in Indiana of so-called middle-skill workers, will receive nearly $4.9 million.

Grants of $3 million each will go the University of Notre Dame, Ball State University, Indiana State University, Indiana Wesleyan University, the University of Southern Indiana and Vincennes University.

Most other schools received awards of roughly $1 million each.

“We are encouraged by the variety of thoughtful programs that colleges and universities proposed,” Cobb stated. “These activities have the potential to increase significantly the number of Indiana college graduates who find satisfying opportunities in the state.”

Nearly all the colleges will use the money to expand internships and experiential learning opportunities for students, the endowment said.

More than 75 percent of the schools will expand their career development programs and try to move them earlier in students’ college experiences.

More than two-thirds of the schools plan to alter their courses to better fit employers’ needs. Nearly half of those schools will create programs specifically focused on entrepreneurship. And 10 colleges will create new degree programs aimed at employer needs.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • wrong problem
    hicks says: “The problem lies not in how many people we’re educating or how we’re educating them, but in having places that they want to live." but that's not exactly the problem. Consider this as the problem and see if you can make changes: the problem is the lifestyle they want liveat there are not enough jobs to afford them the lifestyle they want to live. i know how to fix this. There might be more than one way. -shu
  • Truth
    “The brain-drain efforts in Indiana have largely identified the wrong target and applied a lot of resources to it,” Hicks said in a September interview. “The problem lies not in how many people we’re educating or how we’re educating them, but in having places that they want to live." That says it all. There are neat areas of Indy and surrounding metros, but they pale in comparison to other cities that attract young people with outdoor activities, culture, and good weather. Indy is good for raising a family and low cost of living, but other than that, you are not offering a lot of attractive options compared to mountains, coasts, culture, diversity, open minded individuals.
  • simple
    Here's a cheap way to stop the brain drain. Have the legislature stop focusing on gay marriage and controlling women's bodies!!!
  • Indiana's Reality
    Subsidized education is great for the state budget as it allows the state to reduce it's "contribution" to cost of education, but education does not retain people upon graduation. The state worships at the alter of low taxes, but the high quality/high paying jobs we really want to attract are more dependent on quality of life and public/private amenities and reputation than low taxes. Cincinnati probably has more corporate headquarters than all of Indiana.
  • Lilly Foundation Philanthropy
    Here's a link to the Foundation's awards list - Hoosiers have been fortunate to have Lilly Foundation leadership and awards to counter the Legislature's abandonment of its responsibilities to support education in Indiana (I guess that's why I live in Virginia now?) Well done to Lilly and other philanthropies - scroll through their website to see the millions distributed to colleges and religious groups across the U.S. Shame on the Indiana legislature for using this philanthropy to abrogate their stewardship of Indiana taxpayer money away from education to the pockets of campaign contributors. http://www.lillyendowment.org/pdf/EducationalCollaboration.pdf
  • Brain drain reality
    It's pretty easy to figure out, when you put an emphasis on hospitality and warehousing, you end up with relatively low-paying hospitality and warehouse jobs. Swing and a miss on the IT, and high-tech sectors, which is why places like Seattle have construction cranes dotting the skyline, increasing income, and rising property values.
  • DUH
    Once the state generously funded "state Supported Universities". Now we have "state Assisted Universities", and the brains are going elsewhere.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT