Ethanol makers shrug off expiration of key tax credit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Doom was predicted to befall Indiana’s 13 ethanol plants if Congress were to let expire a tax credit for oil companies of 45 cents per gallon of ethanol that they blended with gasoline.

Thousands would lose their jobs as perhaps two out of every five ethanol plants around the country would close, the Renewable Fuels Association warned in 2010.

Congress, however, let the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit expire last month. But it looks like motorists, rather than ethanol makers, stand to feel the pain.

The reason is the survival of another federal measure, known as the Renewable Fuels Standard. It requires that an increasing amount of renewable fuels such as ethanol be blended into transportation fuel—from 9 million gallons in 2008 to 36 billion gallons in 2022.

So, oil companies still need to blend ethanol into gasoline. But with those blenders no longer pocketing the tax credit, look for gasoline prices to rise 4 cents to 5 cents a gallon, say experts.

“Consumers will probably see a tick-up increase,” said Greg Noble, chief operating officer of the Indiana Soybean Alliance, Indiana Corn Marketing Council and Indiana Corn Growers Association.

Corn is the key ingredient for Indiana’s ethanol plants. The expiration of the blender’s tax credit should bring only a modest decrease in the price of corn, said Noble, former manager of Poet BioRefining's ethanol plant in Portland in east-central Indiana.

Critics of ethanol have complained that rising demand for corn to make the alcohol has pushed up the price of corn, which in turn made food products more expensive.

Ethanol makers are trying to make the fuel additive from other parts of the corn plant, such as stalks. Companies such as Indianapolis-based Xylogenics Inc. are working to perfect strains of yeast that would optimize ethanol yields from corn stalks as well as other plants. Xlylogenics has licensed its yeast to a handful of firms.

Such progress in the industry, along with the continuation of the Renewable Fuels Standard, appears to have quelled the alarms sounded by the Renewable Fuels Association and other ethanol groups 18 months ago.

“The domestic ethanol industry has evolved, policy has progressed, and the market has changed, making now the right time for the incentive to expire,”  the association said last month.

The tax credit had cost taxpayers about $6 billion a year.

Union City-based Cardinal Ethanol, in a recent securities filing, also downplayed the tax credit’s expiration.

It will not have a significant effect on ethanol demand “provided gasoline prices remain high and the renewable fuels requirement … is maintained,” Cardinal said.

After a series of losses following the company’s launch by corn farmers about six years ago, Cardinal has been profitable its two latest fiscal years. In 2011, it posted a $25.5 million profit on revenue of $337 million.

Cardinal has managed to squeeze out revenue not only from ethanol but also from the sale of byproducts such as corn oil and carbon dioxide generated by the plant.

Poet CEO Jeff Broin said the tax credit was a “valuable tool that helped the fledgling ethanol industry gain traction in a market dominated by oil.”

Broin said the industry was equipped to compete without the tax credit, noting improvements in the efficiency of ethanol production. That includes cutting energy use by half and water use by 80 percent.

South Dakota-based Poet, the world's largest ethanol producer, operates Indiana plants in Alexandria, Cloverdale, North Manchester and Portland.

The biggest challenge ahead for ethanol producers might be in finding new demand for their product. Automakers in recent years have increasingly equipped their cars to burn high concentrations of ethanol–85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline, known as E85.

But because ethanol has less energy than gasoline, thus lowers fuel economy, it’s not economical to use unless the price of gasoline is high relative to ethanol.

So the industry has been pressing federal regulators to allow a higher concentration of ethanol in ordinary gasoline. About 10 percent of most gasoline now contains ethanol, which became a replacement for the anti-knock additive methyl tert-butyl ether, or MTBE, which was pulled for environmental reasons.

Last year, the federal government approved a 15-percent blend of ethanol in gasoline for late-model cars, although automakers have been fighting the ruling in court, arguing that it can harm vehicles whose fuel systems are not designed to handle E85.

Alternative fuels advocates are looking for other ways to improve use of ethanol, including pumps that could dispense a blend of 30-percent ethanol, 70-percent gasoline.

Such pumps could allow flex-fuel vehicles to still burn a higher level of ethanol but incur less of a fuel economy penalty than if using E85.

“You’re going to start seeing a lot more E30 stations,” said Kellie Walsh, executive director of the Greater Indiana Clean Cities Coalition, a federally funded group that promotes alternative fuels.

Walsh said a handful of E30 pumps are being installed in Fort Wayne, and that a couple of fuel vendors in Indianapolis are kicking around the idea.

One challenge for the ethanol industry has been convincing service stations to spend extra money to install pumps and tanks equipped to dispense varying levels of the fuel.

Noble said the corn grower groups have raised money through the corn check-off program to help retailers cover ethanol pump infrastructure costs, which has already gone toward installation of at least 14 pumps in the state.

The Indiana Corn Marketing Council said the state’s ethanol industry is responsible for 3,527 full-time jobs, with an economic impact of $2.7 billion annually.

Indiana’s plants generate about 980 million gallons of ethanol per year, about 7 percent of the U.S. output. Indiana is the sixth-largest ethanol-producing state.

Also last month Congress let expire a tariff on ethanol imports that stymied competition from lower-cost Brazilian-made sugar cane ethanol in the United States.

Domestic ethanol producers aren’t wringing hands this time, as Brazil is now experiencing an ethanol shortage. In fact, the U.S. is selling ethanol to Brazil.


  • True cost of Blame
    Wow, you know the true cost of ethanol? What is the true cost of gasoline? Certainly, it is not what I pay at the pump?

    You blame an entire industry for what some local farmers have done in your area. You blame government for investing in America's future. You blame farmers for making smart economic decisions based on market conditions (including minimizing their chemical costs). You blame many things but offer no solutions to the threat America has before it regarding the true cost of oil.

    What do you recommend blenders use in place or ethanol? Gasoline requires an oxidizer. MTBE was certainly not the answer, and right now ethanol is the cheapest blend this country has. This translates to any other chemical costing more to the consumer, and placing new environmental risks associated with mass-producing it.

    Ethanol from corn grain may not be THE answer to this country's fuel supply, but at least the industry is trying to remove the threat of oil addiction that plagues this country. The US makes up 4% of the global population yet consumes 25% of the world's oil supply.

    I'd rather invest my money in a new energy supply over investing my money into the existing energy supplied by countries that hate me, my beliefs, and my country.

    The term "true cost" should include both tangible and intangible costs. What is the "true cost" of oil this country has paid over the years? Ask the families who have lost loved ones in the various wars over the years protecting your energy rights how much they'd pay to have their loved ones back?
  • Corn Ethanol Scam
    If we were allowed to see the true cost of corn ethanol its somewhere in the $5-7 range per gallon. Its is an inferior fuel that gets 2/3 the mileage of gas and tears up engines and has caused massive pollution. Corn ethanol is causing big time envrionmental problems as these rich farmers dump massive amounts of fertilizer, pesticide and herbicide into our streams and water supply. Corn-on-corn rotations are common in my area and the amount of chemicals being used and the runoff associated with farming marginal land (formerly in the conservation program is astounding). These rich farmers got there wish. The have been able to milk the government and the average taxpayer out of even more money via corn ethanol with no real benefits to the consumer. Please write your Congress person and ask them to support repealing the corn ethanol mandate.
    • Tax Credit Gone - Great
      A person needs to pay true market price when fueling their vehicle. And a person needs to be paying what it really costs to drive their vehicle. Then they can make an intelligent decision about their transportation costs. At the same time the Federal Deficit is not going up. All good.
    • B.S.
      Expect gas to jump 4 or 5 cents? It already jumped TWENTY-FOUR cents just at the announcement of the expiration!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

    2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

    3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

    4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

    5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!