IBJNews

Ethics bill clears Senate with unanimous support

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The most sweeping Indiana legislation in years to tighten ethics and lobbying rules for the General Assembly and the executive branch cleared the state Senate 50-0 Thursday and appeared headed soon to Gov. Mitch Daniels for his signature.

The measure would bar lawmakers from becoming lobbyists for one year after their terms expire and require lobbyists to report any gifts worth $50 or more — including meals, drinks and tickets to events—instead of the current $100 limit. It also bars incumbents or candidates for statewide office from raising campaign funds during budget-writing legislative sessions.

The bill won broad bipartisan support in both chambers of the Legislature.

"It is certainly a rarity that you see all 50 senators sign on to a bill," said the lead Senate sponsor, Sen. Patricia Miller, R-Indianapolis.

The only thing slowing the bill's likely eventual passage appeared to be whether its House author, Democratic Speaker Patrick Bauer of South Bend, would send it to a House-Senate conference committee to restore so-called "pay-to-play" language. That provision would bar vendors holding or seeking state contracts worth $100,000 or more per year from donating to the campaigns of candidates seeking state office. Bauer said Thursday he was undecided.

"They did a pretty good job with the rest of the bill," the House leader said.

His approval was significant, since the Senate largely wrote its own ethics measure into the House bill. Among other provisions, the Senate added language that would require university liaisons to the General Assembly to register as lobbyists and bar statewide elected officials from using tax dollars for ads that mention themselves by name, Miller said.

A key provision in Bauer's bill that the Senate kept would require lobbyists to report conflicts of interest involving more than one of their clients and how the lobbyists would resolve those conflicts, Miller said.

"It took a lot of work, a lot of talking to people, give and take, and so on, but it was almost from the very beginning strong support for doing ethics reform this session," Miller said.

Miller said she thought the bill could avoid a conference committee. She and the Senate Minority Leader, Democrat Vi Simpson of Bloomington, huddled with Bauer as the Senate reworked the bill to make sure it had the speaker's approval, Miller said.

"This was a bipartisan and bicameral effort," Simpson said.

Miller said some of the provisions, including registration of university lobbyists and slowing the revolving door of lawmakers becoming lobbyists, had come before lawmakers in other years and gone nowhere. Several former Indiana lawmakers have become registered lobbyists, including some who resigned and took lobbying jobs during the next legislative session.

About 30 other states have similar "revolving-door" waiting periods for lawmakers, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

"We've not had a scandal, something that's forcing this. This is coming about because legislators realize that it's something that needs to be done," Miller said.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT