EU approves Lilly's weekly diabetes drug Bydureon

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

European Union regulators have approved the first once-per-week diabetes medication, the companies that developed the drug said Tuesday.

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co., San Diego-based Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Alkermes Inc. said they received marketing approval for Bydureon, a drug that is intended to help patients control their blood sugar in combination with other diabetes medications. The drug is designed to increase the body's insulin production.

Bydureon is a version of Lilly and Amylin's diabetes drug Byetta, which was approved in the U.S. in April 2005 and in Europe in November 2006. Byetta, or exenatide, is taken twice a day. Alkermes, based in Waltham, Mass., created the technology that gradually releases the drug over the course of a week.

Common side effects of Bydureon included mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation

The companies have not received approval to sell Bydureon in the U.S. The Food and Drug Administration declined to approve Bydureon in October, asking the companies to run a thorough study that evaluated effects of bigger doses of Bydureon on patients' heart rates. The agency also requested results from a study intended to evaluate the efficacy, and labeling of the safety and effectiveness, of the commercial formulation of Bydureon.

Lilly, Amylin and Alkermes plan to submit that information in late 2011.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.