IBJNews

ExactTarget loss widens as revenue grows

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ExactTarget took an $11.6 million loss in the first quarter, more than double the $4.7 million loss it took in the same period a year ago, the company announced Thursday.

The company's stock prices sank Friday morning in the wake of the announcement.

The Indianapolis-based digital marketer reported revenue of $88.9 million, a 39-percent increase over the previous year's period, but continued to pour funding into its growth.

“Our first quarter revenue growth was outstanding ... making us one of the fastest-growing software-as-service companies in the world,” Chairman and CEO Scott Dorsey said in a prepared statement.

But operating costs tied to the company’s growth have consistently eaten up profits.

After accounting for $32.2 million in revenue costs, ExactTarget spent almost as much as its sales gain, $23.7 million, on research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, pushing earnings into the red.

ExactTarget stock has hovered in the low-20-dollar range since the company’s March 2012 initial public offering. Shares closed a $21.97 Thursday, but fell by 9 percent Friday morning, to $20.03.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bullseye!
    Take a look at ETs website and tell me what this company does. It can't be done. This is an old, old story. ET exists to be sold. There's no long term future in peddling what they peddle, and there's very little innovative about what they do. HootSuite will automate your marketing. If we weren't in an innovation wasteland, ET wouldn't even be newsworthy.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT