IBJNews

ExactTarget's stock price falls as insiders unload shares

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ExactTarget Inc.'s stock price fell more than 7 percent Tuesday after company insiders shed more than 7.5 million shares of the Indianapolis-based marketing software firm.

The stock dropped to as low as $21.80 per share during the day before closing at $23.07, a drop of 7.2 percent from Monday's closing price.

The selloff follows the expiration Monday of ExactTarget’s lock-up agreement, a ban that prohibit insiders from selling their shares for a period of time after a company goes public.

Indianapolis-based ExactTarget went public in March at $19 a share, raising $161.5 million. The stock soared to a first-day close of $25.11 and hit a low of $18.53 in early June.

Palo Alto, Calif.-based Technology Crossover Ventures and Boston-based Battery Ventures, two of ExactTarget’s largest stockholders, are responsible for shedding almost three-quarters of the shares unloaded as part of a follow-on offering announced Sept. 11.

Technology Crossover Ventures sold nearly 3.3 million shares, taking its ownership stake in the company down to 17 percent, while Battery Ventures sold more than 2.2 million shares, leaving it with an 11.4-percent ownership stake.

Foster City, Calif.-based Scale Venture Partners unloaded about 900,500 shares, leaving it  with a 4.7-percent stake.

ExactTarget CEO Scott Dorsey sold 300,000 shares, taking his ownership stake from 3.6 percent to 3.1 percent.

The 7.5 million shares unloaded by insiders will be priced in a follow-on public offering at $22.50 each, the company announced Sept. 11.

So-called lock-up agreements ensure insiders and early investors don’t dump their holdings during an IPO. The restriction on stock sales typically lasts up to 180 days. Some experts say tech stocks are especially vulnerable to lock-up expirations because many issue a smaller percentage of their stock during the IPO than other companies. Many tech stocks also have higher valuations than non-tech stocks relative to cash flow and other key measures, critics complain.

“The price of our common stock could decline if there are substantial sales of our common stock” by insiders, ExactTarget said in its registration. “We have a small public float relative to the total number of shares of our common stock that are issued and outstanding.”

Trading of Exact Target’s stock was heavy Tuesday morning, as nearly 2 million shares changed hands. By comparison, volume on Monday reached only 226,300 shares.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Remember:
    ExactTarget CEO Scott Dorsey sold 300,000 shares, taking his ownership stake from 3.6 percent to 3.1 percent.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT