IBJNews

Fair bankruptcy judge issues $33M verdict against Dan Laikin

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A bankruptcy judge in Ohio has issued a stinging rebuke of former Fair Finance Co. board member Dan Laikin and found that he should pay the failed company nearly $33 million.

The Oct. 24 finding by Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum followed years of litigation, culminating with a trial this month. Shea-Stonum said she found Laikin’s arguments for why he did not owe the money—most of it drawn from a line of credit that his friend, Fair CEO Tim Durham, extended—wholly unconvincing.

Rather than cooperate during the discovery phase of the case, Laikin, an Indianapolis businessman, “withheld critical information concerning individuals who had relevant information and could point toward literally volumes of relevant documents,” she wrote.

“He also conveniently misplaced the laptop computer and cell phone which he used for sending electronic mail, his primary means of written communication.”

Shea-Stonum’s order is not the last word on the matter. It serves as a formal recommendation to U.S. District Court Judge Patricia Gaughan, who has the leeway to modify the decision.

Fair Finance’s bankruptcy trustee, Brian Bash, has won a number of big victories against parties that received millions of dollars that Durham doled out from Fair Finance’s coffers. But many of the judgments have been uncollectible because the individuals or businesses had few if any assets.

The vigor with which Bash’s attorneys pursued this case, however, suggests they believe there are significant assets to seize. Through August, the trustee had racked up more than $1.3 million in fees pursuing litigation against Laikin, who is a former CEO of Los Angeles-based National Lampoon Inc. and at one point owned two mansions in Southern California.

Laikin is one of many friends and business associates of Durham who received large loans from Fair, but never paid them back, attorneys for Bash allege. Durham also scooped up tens of millions of dollars for himself. The financial drain left Akron-based Fair unable to repay more than 5,000 Ohio investors who bought more than $200 million in unsecured notes from the company.

Federal prosecutors later charged that Durham ran Fair as a massive Ponzi scheme. A jury in June 2012 found Durham guilty on 12 felony counts—a verdict he’s appealing. A judge sentenced him in August of that year to 50 years in prison.

Laikin has had his own criminal troubles. A federal judge in 2010 sent him to prison for orchestrating an ultimately unsuccessful scheme to pump up the slumbering stock price of National Lampoon.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

ADVERTISEMENT