IBJNews

FARRA: Don't expect big dividends from banks anytime soon

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

FarraBanks will not return to their status as reliable sources of shareholder dividends for three years or longer. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has driven deposit rates to zero, effectively forcing investors to consider dividends as an alternative source of income, but banks as a group will not be a source of these dividends.

Commercial banks emerged from the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s with a renewed focus on returning earnings to shareholders via steady and rising dividend payments. This pattern continued into the 2000s, with banks a favorite pick for dividend-seeking investors.

That is, until the financial crisis of 2007-2009 nearly decimated the industry and the economy to boot. Massive losses and the acceptance of TARP funds from the federal government required the industry to reduce dividends to a scant amount in 2009 and have been slowly rising ever since.

Banking is certainly one of the most regulated industries. Polls suggest the public thinks banks should be held on an even tighter leash, reflecting the impact banks had on the economy and financial markets during the crisis years. With a high level of public and legislative mistrust, several obstacles will prevent banks from paying higher dividends in the near future.

1. Higher capital requirements. A bank’s protection from insolvency is its equity capital. These requirements have been revised several times following the two banking crises of the past 25 years (savings and loans in the late 1980s and the housing-inspired of 2007-2009). Congress passed the Dodd-Frank banking law in 2010, containing 2,300 pages of guidelines and more than 6,000 pages (and counting) of regulation.

Most bankers profess they still don’t know what rules to follow and therefore act cautiously when considering making loans. Forcing banks to carry higher capital positions will retard dividend growth.

2. Sluggish loan growth. “Drop in Borrowing Squeezes Banks” read the headline in The Wall Street Journal on April 26. While bankers may be ready to make new loans to creditworthy customers, commercial loan customers are instead hoarding cash or paying cash for large expenditures. Large publicly traded companies are bypassing banks to issue corporate debt to lock in generationally low interest rates.

Finally, individuals are more focused on thrift, paying down credit cards and increasing savings. These trends are not likely to change overnight.

3. Declining gross profit margins. Banks earn a spread between interest they earn from loans and investment securities and interest paid on deposits and other borrowings. With no loan growth and investment yields at 4 percent or lower, bank margins have been slowly declining the past four years and are not a recipe for higher dividend payments.

4. Ongoing regulatory and political overhang. Banks have been the convenient scapegoat for the country’s ills the past three election cycles going back to 2008.

Additionally, the worry about the government debt crisis in Europe spreading around the world (many large U.S. banks do business with their brethren around the globe) has forced U.S. regulators to expand their oversight to previously less-risky areas of a bank’s business.

Other than loans to healthy companies and consumers (who most likely are not borrowing, anyway), banks are finding fewer profitable loan opportunities given the regulatory risk they face.

Events such as the huge losses incurred by JPMorgan Chase from the so-called London Whale in spring of 2011 will keep regulators watching daily activities to ensure another such disaster does not happen again. Measured risks are necessary for a bank to increase earnings, but the regulatory environment runs counter to that need.

5. Too many banks. There are more than 9,000 banks with assets over $100 million and scores more smaller community banks. Most markets are over-banked, meaning too many lenders chasing too few loans and too many branches in an era of greater use of electronic banking services.

The high fixed costs of operating a bank are not being offset by loan growth; at some point, there will be another wave of consolidation and a marked reduction in the number of physical bank locations. Neither trend will auger well for higher dividends.

Economists have cited the increasing use of financial service products as a primary driver of economic growth from the early 1980s through the onset of the financial crisis. This trend has since been reversed and the economy should benefit in the long run from lower debt levels and greater cash and equity in daily transactions.

The banking system is measurably stronger than it was five years ago, but the price paid for this strength is lower profits returned to shareholders in the form of cash dividends.•

__________

Farra is a co-founder of Woodley Farra Manion Portfolio Management Inc. Views expressed here are the writer’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT