IBJNews

FCC fines Greenfield broadcaster for transmitting from silo

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Greenfield broadcaster who in 2004 tried to force high school and college radio stations to share airtime with him has been fined $8,000 for transmitting from atop a Hancock County farm silo.

The Federal Communications Commission on Monday signed a forfeiture order against Martin Hensley’s Hoosier Public Radio Corp. for operating WRFM-FM 89.1 from an unauthorized location without special temporary authorization.

The commission said WRFM broadcast from the silo on Sept. 28, 2010, and on Feb. 10 and 14, 2011. The silo was three miles from WRFM’s authorized transmitter site.

According to the FCC’s order, the unauthorized transmissions from the silo interfered with an aircraft radio frequency. Hoosier Public Radio claimed there was insufficient evidence of such interference. 

Moreover, the company insisted it had applied to the FCC for temporary permission to broadcast from the silo.

But the FCC said Hoosier hadn’t filed the request until Feb.16, 2011, and even then it was to have broadcast from a church steeple in Wilkinson.

The case apparently began after the Federal Aviation Administration complained to the FCC of interference on an aeronautical radio frequency.

The FCC went as far as sending an agent to Hancock County, who tracked down the silo antenna. He turned off the WRFM transmitter and the interference ceased, according to the forfeiture order.

Hensley told IBJ on Wednesday that he believed Hoosier had filed the application to broadcast from the silo in a timely manner and hadn't been notified about the $8,000 fine.

Hensley said he was under the impression that the matter had been settled, with the FCC recently renewing WRFM’s license without problems.

According to the FCC, Hensley had sought a reduced fine, based on previous compliance and his company's “inability to pay.”

In a terse response, the FCC denied relief, saying Hoosier Public Broadcasting failed to provide sufficient financial documentation that it was without means to pay.

“We find it entirely implausible that a corporation operating a radio station could have zero income and zero cash on hand,” the FCC said.

Hensley and his Hoosier Public Radio made headlines in 2004 when he attempted to use a rarely invoked FCC rule that could force educational stations that broadcast less than 12 hours a day to share airtime.

In 2005, the FCC denied Hensley’s petition, which would have forced student-run stations at Carmel High School, Ben Davis High School, Franklin Central High School and Pendleton Heights High School to share airtime with Hoosier.

Schools complained that they were forced to hire attorneys to fight Hoosier Public Radio.

Hoosier Public Radio’s other holdings include WHUZ-FM 88.5 in Cole and WTRE-FM 89.9 in Greensburg, according to FCC records.

 


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT