IBJNews

FCC fines Greenfield broadcaster for transmitting from silo

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Greenfield broadcaster who in 2004 tried to force high school and college radio stations to share airtime with him has been fined $8,000 for transmitting from atop a Hancock County farm silo.

The Federal Communications Commission on Monday signed a forfeiture order against Martin Hensley’s Hoosier Public Radio Corp. for operating WRFM-FM 89.1 from an unauthorized location without special temporary authorization.

The commission said WRFM broadcast from the silo on Sept. 28, 2010, and on Feb. 10 and 14, 2011. The silo was three miles from WRFM’s authorized transmitter site.

According to the FCC’s order, the unauthorized transmissions from the silo interfered with an aircraft radio frequency. Hoosier Public Radio claimed there was insufficient evidence of such interference. 

Moreover, the company insisted it had applied to the FCC for temporary permission to broadcast from the silo.

But the FCC said Hoosier hadn’t filed the request until Feb.16, 2011, and even then it was to have broadcast from a church steeple in Wilkinson.

The case apparently began after the Federal Aviation Administration complained to the FCC of interference on an aeronautical radio frequency.

The FCC went as far as sending an agent to Hancock County, who tracked down the silo antenna. He turned off the WRFM transmitter and the interference ceased, according to the forfeiture order.

Hensley told IBJ on Wednesday that he believed Hoosier had filed the application to broadcast from the silo in a timely manner and hadn't been notified about the $8,000 fine.

Hensley said he was under the impression that the matter had been settled, with the FCC recently renewing WRFM’s license without problems.

According to the FCC, Hensley had sought a reduced fine, based on previous compliance and his company's “inability to pay.”

In a terse response, the FCC denied relief, saying Hoosier Public Broadcasting failed to provide sufficient financial documentation that it was without means to pay.

“We find it entirely implausible that a corporation operating a radio station could have zero income and zero cash on hand,” the FCC said.

Hensley and his Hoosier Public Radio made headlines in 2004 when he attempted to use a rarely invoked FCC rule that could force educational stations that broadcast less than 12 hours a day to share airtime.

In 2005, the FCC denied Hensley’s petition, which would have forced student-run stations at Carmel High School, Ben Davis High School, Franklin Central High School and Pendleton Heights High School to share airtime with Hoosier.

Schools complained that they were forced to hire attorneys to fight Hoosier Public Radio.

Hoosier Public Radio’s other holdings include WHUZ-FM 88.5 in Cole and WTRE-FM 89.9 in Greensburg, according to FCC records.

 


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT