IBJNews

Federal budget could create headaches for Rolls-Royce

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The federal budget crunch already has halted work on a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter being developed by General Electric and Rolls-Royce—putting thousands of jobs in jeopardy—and it's not the only aerospace program facing an uncertain future.

Defense and aerospace analysts think the Marine Corps will have trouble securing a multi-year contract for the V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, each of which takes two engines made by Rolls-Royce in Indianapolis.

“The federal budgeting process is in more disarray than I have ever seen it,” said Loren Thompson, chief operating officer the Lexington Institute, a Virginia-based think tank that focuses on defense and other national policy issues. “The ability of military services to conclude multi-year contracts on any program is in question.”

Multi-year contracts lower the costs per aircraft, compared to year-by-year deals, and they allow manufacturers to plan their work for five years at a time, Thompson said.

The current contract for the Osprey doesn’t expire until Sept. 30, 2012, but manufacturers typically develop cost estimates long before expirations. Thompson doesn’t think the federal government’s recent near-shutdown will be a one-time event.

“It’s going to be 18 months of fiscal chaos,” he said.

The fact that House Republicans went against Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, in voting to cut the alternate engine program for the F-35 points to a new climate for defense spending, said Richard Aboulafia, aviation industry analyst at Virginia research firm Teal Group.

About 2,500 jobs—mostly in Indiana and Ohio—are tied to development of the engine, and GE has said that figure could nearly double if the project reaches peak production. “The only thing that’s changed is the nature of our politics,” Aboulafia said.

Last month, the U.S. Defense Department issued a 90-day stop-work order after the program was eliminated from the remainder of the 2011 budget. The companies will continue working on the engine, called the F136, but are reassigning most of their people to other projects until the 2012 budget is settled. Rolls-Royce had about 130 people, mostly engineers, working on the F136 in Plainfield and Indianapolis, spokesman George McLaren said.

The Osprey is a much larger, ongoing program for Rolls-Royce. The company has produced more than 450 engines for the Osprey since being selected in 1986, and its $222 million engine-and-services contract in 2009 was more than double the next-largest contract awarded that year.

Rolls-Royce officials would not provide current information on the Osprey contract, saying only that “we’re proud of the program and look forward to continued service for our customers.”

The Osprey's blades pivot, so it takes off and lands like a helicopter but flies like a plane. Developed by Bell Helicopter and Boeing Co., it has a well-documented track record of technical issues and crashes.

It is also expensive. The Marine Corps’ 2012 budget request for 30 of the aircraft is $2.31 billion, or about $77 million each, said Joseph Katzman, editor-in-chief at Defense Industry Daily.

Katzman and Thompson think the Marine Corps, which favors the Osprey for its unique capabilities, will keep the program going, but they are split on the wisdom of that decision.

“The Osprey has enough political backing to continue,” Katzman said. “Ten years down the line, that could really bite the Marine Corps.”

The Government Accountability Office has documented the Osprey’s maintenance problems, which stem from a huge downdraft that sends sand into the engines.

With the cost of maintenance, Katzman predicted the Marines eventually will face a tough choice. “You start not buying other things to feed this gorilla, or you retire it long before its due date.”

Thompson thinks the Marines have picked a winner for budgetary and tactical reasons. In an article for Forbes earlier this month, he argued that the Osprey is the cheapest rotorcraft the Marines operate, when viewed in terms of cost per seat-mile, because it holds more people and flies farther than a helicopter.

The March 22 rescue of a fighter pilot who crashed in Libya, Thompson wrote, opened a “new chapter in the expanding chronicle of Osprey successes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT