IBJNews

Feds clear WellPoint's $4.5B acquisition of Amerigroup

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The government has dropped its antitrust concerns about health insurer WellPoint Inc.'s proposed acquisition of Amerigroup Corp., the Justice Department said Wednesday, clearing WellPoint to proceed with the $4.46 billion deal.

Justice officials had objected to the proposed merger because WellPoint and Amerigroup are the only two providers of Medicaid managed care plans in northern Virginia. The merger "would have substantially lessened competition" by creating a monopoly in Medicaid managed care in nine counties and four cities in the region, the Justice Department said.

To address that concern, Amerigroup agreed to sell its Virginia business, Amerigroup Virginia Inc., to the Inova Health System Foundation. It did not disclose financial terms of that deal, which was announced in September and is conditioned on the closing of the WellPoint-Amerigroup merger.

The sale to Inova ensures that Medicaid users will have at least two options for managed care, the Justice Department said.

Amerigroup's sale of the unit "will ensure continued competition," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Renata Hesse, who heads the department's Antitrust Division, in a statement. "Preserving competition in health care markets is vital to ensuring that consumers receive better and more innovative health care services."

Amerigroup, based in Virginia Beach, has more than 2.7 million members in 13 states. The Virginia subsidiary has 55,000 members, including those in government assistance programs such as the Children's Health Insurance Program.

WellPoint, based in Indianapolis, is the nation's second-biggest health insurer. It said in July that it would pay $92 per share for Amerigroup and grab a bigger piece of the growing market of patients covered by Medicaid, the federal-state health program for low-income people.

WellPoint shares fell 16 cents, to $54.81 each, in afternoon trading. Amerigroup rose 9 cents, to $91.77.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Obamacare doing it's job!
    If you think Dem's wanted Obamacare to lower premiums, then you should put a label on your forehead with the word "Moron" on it. Dem's wanted this bill because they wanted to take out all of the little insurance companies that were competing against their high-rolling donors like Anthem. This is just one of many that are being forced to sell because they can't take the mandates of Obamacare and survive. Just like M-Plan, who collapsed when Obamacare was introduced, this company also knows that they can't offer products at a competitive cost now that they have thousands of mandates placed upon them. What happens when there is only 4 or 5 insurance companies in a few years? The price of insurance will skyrocket, then Obamacare idiots will step in and "Save Us" by putting all of us on government run healthcare, and you see how well they manage healthcare now! Not too dam good! When the big dog insurance companies take over, they will also have more money to give to their Democrap buddies.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT