IBJNews

Final Four run presents challenges for Butler

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
LeCrone mug LeCrone

Horizon League Commissioner Jon LeCrone is hopeful Butler University officials will not let their enthusiasm over the school’s recent push to the NCAA Championship game run wild.

LeCrone has warned all 10 Horizon League schools not to let the pursuit of athletic excellence turn into the bidding war for coaches and arms race for facilities that it has in many power conferences.

That may be easier said than done. Butler alumni groups had formed to raise money to retain head men’s basketball coach Brad Stevens even before his contract was extended April 8.

Collier mug Collier

And on April 1, Butler Athletics Director Barry Collier and President Bobby Fong unveiled a $10 million-plus capital campaign to make improvements to Hinkle Fieldhouse. Butler has hired Indianapolis architect firm Moody Nolan to study renovation costs.

But after conversations with Collier in the days leading up to and following Butler’s near miss against Duke University, LeCrone is confident Butler will stay true to its own mission and to that of the Horizon League.

Fong mug Fong

“We’ve been building this league in a very special way for 18 years,” said LeCrone from the Horizon League’s Indianapolis headquarters. “We realized a long time ago that we cannot compete if the only window we look out is the financial one. We cannot and our schools won’t try to go out and double and triple their budgets.”

LeCrone added that Butler’s success only fortifies the league’s position.

“They’ve shown what a team from the Horizon League can do,” LeCrone said. “Butler has shown that it’s more about people than facilities; it’s more about working as a team than having the biggest budget.”

Butler has a basketball budget of $1.7 million, 142nd out of 345 NCAA Division I schools, according to bbstate.com, which has kept a database on all college sports programs for a decade.

Butler had by far the smallest men’s basketball budget of any team in the Final Four. West Virginia spends $6 million annually, Michigan State $9 million and Duke—which has the biggest men’s basketball budget among NCAA schools—shells out $13.9 million a year.

Butler barLikewise, Butler trails many of its statewide brethren. Indiana University has a $6.9 million annual budget for men’s basketball, Purdue has a $4.7 million budget, and Notre Dame spends $4.4 million, according to the schools’ own filings and bbstate.com.

“There’s going to be pressure on Butler, no doubt,” said Bob Beaudine, whose Dallas-based executive search firm counts many of the nation’s largest schools and most successful coaches as clients. “There will be a swell of support for this program, but there will also be increased demands from corporate sponsors and especially alumni groups.”

The expectations will be a lot to handle, Beaudine said, for a school whose $11.2 million athletics department budget ranks 215th among Division I schools.

But Fong and Collier have vowed not to let that pressure change their focus.

“We’re not about to try to compete financially with the big schools and conferences,” Fong said. “We have our own ways of doing things and our own measuring sticks.”

Those measuring sticks, LeCrone said, have been discussed since the Horizon League was founded in 1979 as the Midwestern City Conference.

“We’ve always been focused on developing value-based leadership,” LeCrone said. “We have always adopted metrics the 10 schools in this conference can live with and not worry about other conferences.”

Even if Butler had the desire to compete with bigger schools, it simply might not be possible.

Butler, with about 40,000 living alumni, won’t ever garner the support of a large school like IU, with 495,000 living alumni, or Ohio State University, with nearly 600,000. That alumni base is one reason Ohio State can afford to spend $102 million annually on athletics.

Of course, a historically stellar football program also generates tens of millions of dollars for schools like Ohio State. Butler generates very little through its football program.

The disparity manifests itself in many ways. “The first measure of disparity is the ability to pay to attract and retain a top-notch coach,” said Richard Sheehan, University of Notre Dame economist and author of “Keeping Score: The Economics of Big-Time Sports.”

Even before Butler’s tournament run, the school had dramatically increased what it pays its men’s head basketball coach, from $245,000 three years ago to a base pay of $350,000 last year. Terms of Stevens’ new 12-year contract were not available at IBJ deadline, but sports business experts project his base pay now exceeds $500,000.

Gonzaga University, which has had a decade-long run of success in men’s college basketball, has shown what a small school can do. Gonzaga, a school with an enrollment of less than 5,000, last year paid its head men’s basketball coach, Mark Few, $851,000 in base pay with additional bonuses. In 2000, Gonzaga paid its basketball coach just $200,000, according to school filings.

Gonzaga has seen the fruits of its labor, with its enrollment increasing almost 70 percent since 2000. Officials for the private school in Spokane, Wash., said the academic quality of its student body has improved during that time. But Gonzaga’s success has also taken its toll.

“Gonzaga has really tipped the scales in the West Coast Conference,” Sheehan said. “And now you’re seeing other schools there scrambling to compete. In most cases, those schools really can’t afford that kind of financial commitment.”

Even though Butler has increased Stevens’ pay, the school will likely never be able to pay as much as IU and Purdue, which each offer their basketball coaches packages worth more than $2 million annually when incentives are included.

On top of coaches’ pay and facilities improvements, Butler may also feel pressure to increase its budget for things like recruiting. Butler’s 2009 sports recruiting budget of $75,000 is woefully behind IU’s nearly $527,000. Gonzaga had a nearly $187,000 recruiting budget in 2009.

Tom King, a 1966 Butler graduate and 24-year member of the school’s board of trustees through the late 1990s, said he supports upgrading the school’s athletics department, but not in an attempt to compete financially with the biggest NCAA schools.

“We’ve seen what using our basketball program as a sales and marketing tool can do,” King said. “After our last Sweet Sixteen run [in 2007], we saw an enrollment bump of 20 percent and an alumni-donations increase of more than 10 percent.”

King wouldn’t say how much he thinks the Butler athletics department budget should increase, but said he believes Fong and Collier are the right people to lead the school into the new frontier.

“No one foresaw this,” King said. “No one a year ago would have predicted Butler would make it to the Final Four. Now we have a new set of opportunities and challenges to manage.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • agreed
    I agree with Dawgboy's sentiments.. I don't honestly believe that Butler will ever seek to be the kind of basketball-driven institution like Duke, or Syracuse, or IU. The administration, teachers, and parents have done a fantastic job of stressing to the students that academics should always come first. That's why I chose to go to Butler and why when my daughter becomes a HS senior, I will strongly encourage her to go there as well.

    That being said, I don't think LeCrone has much to worry about when it comes to the other institutions. Just sayin.
  • Butler Dawgs
    I for one am not holding them to high standards of making it to the Final Four every year from here on out. I would just be happy to have the kind of hustle and teamwork that was apparent in this years team. I would say that Butler recruiting has to stay true to getting those guys that know how to play a role and not get big headed. That's why Butler was so successful this year and why they have been so successful in the past. They recruit great individual men who can also play great team basketball.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT