IBJNews

Finish Line's second-quarter profit jumps to $16.8M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based The Finish Line Inc. said Thursday that its second-quarter profit rose as it rebounded from a messy quarter a year earlier after the athletic shoe retailer sold its unsuccessful Man Alive hip-hop stores.

The company said it earned $16.8 million, or 31 cents per share, during the quarter that ended Aug. 28, after losing $874,000, or 2 cents per share, during the same period last year.

Revenue rose slightly to $301.1 million, from $298.7 million in 2009.

The loss a year earlier mostly resulted from exiting the street wear business in July 2009.

Sales at stores open at least a year—a key indicator for retailers because it excludes results from stores that open or close during the year—rose 2 percent, after declining 9.9 percent a year earlier.

The company ended the quarter with no interest-bearing debt and $253.7 million in cash and equivalents, up from $142.9 million a year earlier.

Like many of its peers, The Finish Line has gotten a boost from the growing popularity of so-called "toning shoes"—oddly shaped footwear with an unstable sole that throws off the user's balance, which manufacturers say help to burn calories, improve posture and firm up the buttocks, thighs and calves. As IBJ reported in August, investment bank Morgan Stanley estimates the shoes could generate $70 million in revenue for Finish Line in fiscal 2011, or about 6 percent of the company’s revenue.

The company also is "assessing growth opportunities outside of our core business," Chairman and CEO Glenn Lyon said in a prepared statement. 

Indeed, the chain is working on a three-part strategy for spending its accumulated cash: reinvesting in the core Finish Line business, returning funds to shareholders through higher dividends and share repurchases, and diversifying its business either with a new retail concept developed in-house or through acquisitions.

For the first half of this fiscal year, the company posted a profit of $30.5 million, or 56 cents per share, compared with a loss of $1.5 million, or 3 cents per share, during the first half of 2009. Revenue rose 4.5 percent to $583.5 million, from $557.8 million a year earlier.

Finish Line operates 667 stores in 47 states.

Its shares had risen 46 cents, or 3 percent, to close at $15.69 before the results were released. They fell $1.94, or 12.4 percent, to $13.75 in aftermarket trading.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT