IBJNews

Finish Line stock falls after analyst's downgrade

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An analyst downgraded The Finish Line Inc.'s stock on Wednesday, saying that the Indianapolis-based sneaker and athletic clothing retailer will likely continue to lose share to rival Foot Locker.

Finish Line shares slid 4.3 percent Wednesday after the downgrade, falling $1.06, to $23.45 per share.

Sam Poser of Birmingham, Ala.-based investment firm Sterne Agee & Leach said in a report to clients that Foot Locker had better revenue at stores open at least a year during the first quarter than Finish Line did. Finish Line also appears to be trailing its competitor in the second quarter.

This metric is an important gauge of a retailer's health because it excludes results from stores recently opened or closed.

Poser said in that much of Finish Line's same-store revenue strength came from sales in the basketball category, in particular sales of Michael Jordan products. The analyst said this makes up about 35 percent of Finish Line's business, compared with 45 percent of Foot Locker's business.

Poser is also concerned about the Finish Line's investments in new store concepts, saying that the company has been overly anxious to roll out the concepts but needs to do more testing on in-store layouts to see if they are the proper format.

"We believe that Finish Line's new store ideas are great, but the apparent lack of patience by management will likely continue to result in limited to no flow-through to the bottom line even with strong same-store sales," he wrote.

Poser lowered Finish Line Inc.'s rating to "Underperform" from "Neutral" and set a $20 price target.

Finish Line shares are down 10 percent from their 52-week high of $26.16 in late March. They traded as low as $17.80 in mid-September.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT