IBJNews

Finish Line stock falls after analyst's downgrade

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

An analyst downgraded The Finish Line Inc.'s stock on Wednesday, saying that the Indianapolis-based sneaker and athletic clothing retailer will likely continue to lose share to rival Foot Locker.

Finish Line shares slid 4.3 percent Wednesday after the downgrade, falling $1.06, to $23.45 per share.

Sam Poser of Birmingham, Ala.-based investment firm Sterne Agee & Leach said in a report to clients that Foot Locker had better revenue at stores open at least a year during the first quarter than Finish Line did. Finish Line also appears to be trailing its competitor in the second quarter.

This metric is an important gauge of a retailer's health because it excludes results from stores recently opened or closed.

Poser said in that much of Finish Line's same-store revenue strength came from sales in the basketball category, in particular sales of Michael Jordan products. The analyst said this makes up about 35 percent of Finish Line's business, compared with 45 percent of Foot Locker's business.

Poser is also concerned about the Finish Line's investments in new store concepts, saying that the company has been overly anxious to roll out the concepts but needs to do more testing on in-store layouts to see if they are the proper format.

"We believe that Finish Line's new store ideas are great, but the apparent lack of patience by management will likely continue to result in limited to no flow-through to the bottom line even with strong same-store sales," he wrote.

Poser lowered Finish Line Inc.'s rating to "Underperform" from "Neutral" and set a $20 price target.

Finish Line shares are down 10 percent from their 52-week high of $26.16 in late March. They traded as low as $17.80 in mid-September.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT