IBJNews

Firms put off paying, despite easing financial pressure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Small Business Trends

Pity Heidi Brumback and myriad other small-business owners like her. More than a year after the end of the recession, Brumback’s customers still put off paying their bills, and her vendors still clamor for their money.

Receivables for her Hoosier Equipment Service Inc. averaged about 60 days before the recession; now, the “float” has swelled to 100 days.

Brumback is waiting nearly twice as long for her money because the environmental consultants who use her firm to haul away contaminated earth are being paid later by general contractors, which are being paid later by property owners and developers.

The Zionsville businesswoman understands her customers’ predicaments. She nonetheless feels she has little choice but to delay paying the landfills and the companies that haul in fresh dirt.

But Brumback hasn’t been able to shift enough of the shortfall to avoid giving herself a salary cut and carrying out the company’s first layoff, albeit a small one.

“People are short on cash, with the economy,” she said. “You’re working a lot harder to make less. We’re in survival mode right now.”

If there’s good news for recession survivors, it’s that the trend toward longer receivables appears to have leveled off.

What’s less clear is how soon—or even whether—receivables will return to the 30 days that was standard for most businesses before the recession began in December 2007.

A spot check of Indianapolis-area accounting firms reveals that companies of all stripes are still putting off paying bills as long as possible to conserve precious operating capital.

R.J. Pile & Co. LLC Tax Director Carol Howard has watched the benchmark rise to 45 days, and Larry Greenwalt, managing partner of Greenwalt CPAs Inc., is seeing a lot of 50-day receivables. In some cases, particularly in construction, he said, the lags extend to a ripe 120.

The economy clearly fueled the trend. But Greenwalt believes hard times only accelerated a practice that took root a couple of years before the recession of businesses’ using their vendors to replace or supplement bank credit lines.

As small companies scratch together operating capital, they confront a delicate dance with customers. Push too aggressively, and customers might take their business elsewhere; wait passively, and the check might never arrive.

Howard said businesses with the best track records of getting paid establish relationships with customers: “The more you know the person you’re doing business with, the more you’re going to cooperate and pay your bill on time.”

Allowing receivables to languish too long is risky. Banks typically consider bills unpaid for 90 days or more uncollectible.

Hoosier Equipment Service cut costs across the board and saw costs fall even further when two longtime managers left and were not replaced.

Compensating for the lengthy receivables by bidding projects at higher prices isn’t an option, Brumback said. So many companies are hungry for work of any kind that low-ball proposals have become the norm.

Not every small business is still in the wringer.

Robb Fine, co-owner of Fine Promotions Inc., also in Zionsville, saw his receivables climb from an average of 39 days before the recession to about 47 days during the toughest times, then recede to 39 late last year.

The company, which puts company logos on such items as luggage and crystal, survived by cutting strapped customers some slack when times were toughest, but also by watching receivables like a hawk.

“It’s all about the practices you do,” Fine said. “If you allow [customers] to stretch you, they will.”

Uncertain future

Whether receivables return to old standards remains to be seen.

Greenwalt, the CPA, sees a leveling off and expects the new normal to settle at about 45 days. He sees no evidence of 30 days making a comeback.

Howard sees receivables as a “lagging indicator” of the economy. Businesses will pay on time only after they’re flush with money and feel they can afford to.

Paying late isn’t the right thing to do, she said, but added that companies will take advantage of slack as long as they can get away with it.

“Just the nature of things, it’s going to be a while before things, if ever, go back to 30” days, Howard said.

However, another observer predicts a swing back to 30 days within a couple of years.

Mike Brittian, president and chief operating officer of the Great Lakes region of the National Association of Credit Management, a not-for-profit of businesses offering commercial credit, said the number of days needed to collect on invoices could shrink surprisingly fast as the economy improves.

Already, the average size of receivables placed with a collection agency operated by the organization has begun to wither. The average in Indiana peaked at $2,773 in 2008 and then dropped steadily to $2,350 last year, Brittian said.

As the recession wore on, surviving businesses collected larger and larger contracts, then some of those companies went sour, driving up the amounts sent to collection agencies, he said.

Now the size of those placements are in retreat, and the size will continue to shrink as the economy improves and new businesses begin to nab contracts.

Ultimately, the improved economy will position businesses to demand prompt payments from customers.

“It’s yet to happen,” Brittian said, but “it can go fast.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT