IBJNews

First Internet Bank suffers first loss since 2000

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Problem loans dragged First Internet Bancorp into the red last year for the first time in nearly a decade.

The Indianapolis-based parent company of First Internet Bank of Indiana on Friday announced a loss of $2.1 million, or $1.12 per share, for 2009, compared with profit of $1.6 million, or 84 cents per share, the previous year.

The annual loss was the first for the 11-year-old company since it became profitable in 2001.

First Internet last year increased its provision for loan losses 140 percent, or by $6.7 million, to $11.6 million. According to First Internet, that reserve included $3 million set aside in December to address a single troubled commercial loan. The bank’s management said it believes it can eventually recover about $2 million of the $3 million.

“Unemployment and the real estate market continue to plague a portion of our customers, commercial and consumer alike,” First Internet Chairman and CEO David Becker said in a prepared statement.

As of Dec. 31, First Internet deposits stood at $411.6 million, a 6-percent decrease from the $439.2 million at the end of 2008. Loans fell 4 percent, from $324.4 million to $312.6 million. Assets dropped from $543 million to $504.6 million.

Despite its problems with soured loans, there were bright spots in First Internet’s 2009 results. Net-interest income grew 12 percent, from $12.3 million in 2008 to $13.7 million in 2009. Non-interest income also increased, from $2.6 million to $2.9 million. First Internet attributed the growth to modestly higher asset yields, lower cost of funds and an increase in the bank’s online mortgage-origination operation.

Much of the bank’s mortgage business was in refinancing, driven by 2009’s low mortgage rates. First Internet does not hold the mortgages it originates on its balance sheet, instead selling them on the secondary market.

Shares of First Internet are priced at $4.26 on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board. One year ago, they were worth $8 per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Love
    I love FirstIB. I've been a customer since shortly after they started.

    All I've got...
  • Beam Me Up Scotty Banks
    The long term issue with pure play internet banks is their dependence on deposits and loans that tend to be priced higher and without a more local client base which is a provider of less expensive core deposits the cycle is hard to break. BANKALCHEMIST.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT