IBJNews

First Internet Bank suffers first loss since 2000

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Problem loans dragged First Internet Bancorp into the red last year for the first time in nearly a decade.

The Indianapolis-based parent company of First Internet Bank of Indiana on Friday announced a loss of $2.1 million, or $1.12 per share, for 2009, compared with profit of $1.6 million, or 84 cents per share, the previous year.

The annual loss was the first for the 11-year-old company since it became profitable in 2001.

First Internet last year increased its provision for loan losses 140 percent, or by $6.7 million, to $11.6 million. According to First Internet, that reserve included $3 million set aside in December to address a single troubled commercial loan. The bank’s management said it believes it can eventually recover about $2 million of the $3 million.

“Unemployment and the real estate market continue to plague a portion of our customers, commercial and consumer alike,” First Internet Chairman and CEO David Becker said in a prepared statement.

As of Dec. 31, First Internet deposits stood at $411.6 million, a 6-percent decrease from the $439.2 million at the end of 2008. Loans fell 4 percent, from $324.4 million to $312.6 million. Assets dropped from $543 million to $504.6 million.

Despite its problems with soured loans, there were bright spots in First Internet’s 2009 results. Net-interest income grew 12 percent, from $12.3 million in 2008 to $13.7 million in 2009. Non-interest income also increased, from $2.6 million to $2.9 million. First Internet attributed the growth to modestly higher asset yields, lower cost of funds and an increase in the bank’s online mortgage-origination operation.

Much of the bank’s mortgage business was in refinancing, driven by 2009’s low mortgage rates. First Internet does not hold the mortgages it originates on its balance sheet, instead selling them on the secondary market.

Shares of First Internet are priced at $4.26 on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board. One year ago, they were worth $8 per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Love
    I love FirstIB. I've been a customer since shortly after they started.

    All I've got...
  • Beam Me Up Scotty Banks
    The long term issue with pure play internet banks is their dependence on deposits and loans that tend to be priced higher and without a more local client base which is a provider of less expensive core deposits the cycle is hard to break. BANKALCHEMIST.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT