IBJNews

First Internet Bank suffers first loss since 2000

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Problem loans dragged First Internet Bancorp into the red last year for the first time in nearly a decade.

The Indianapolis-based parent company of First Internet Bank of Indiana on Friday announced a loss of $2.1 million, or $1.12 per share, for 2009, compared with profit of $1.6 million, or 84 cents per share, the previous year.

The annual loss was the first for the 11-year-old company since it became profitable in 2001.

First Internet last year increased its provision for loan losses 140 percent, or by $6.7 million, to $11.6 million. According to First Internet, that reserve included $3 million set aside in December to address a single troubled commercial loan. The bank’s management said it believes it can eventually recover about $2 million of the $3 million.

“Unemployment and the real estate market continue to plague a portion of our customers, commercial and consumer alike,” First Internet Chairman and CEO David Becker said in a prepared statement.

As of Dec. 31, First Internet deposits stood at $411.6 million, a 6-percent decrease from the $439.2 million at the end of 2008. Loans fell 4 percent, from $324.4 million to $312.6 million. Assets dropped from $543 million to $504.6 million.

Despite its problems with soured loans, there were bright spots in First Internet’s 2009 results. Net-interest income grew 12 percent, from $12.3 million in 2008 to $13.7 million in 2009. Non-interest income also increased, from $2.6 million to $2.9 million. First Internet attributed the growth to modestly higher asset yields, lower cost of funds and an increase in the bank’s online mortgage-origination operation.

Much of the bank’s mortgage business was in refinancing, driven by 2009’s low mortgage rates. First Internet does not hold the mortgages it originates on its balance sheet, instead selling them on the secondary market.

Shares of First Internet are priced at $4.26 on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board. One year ago, they were worth $8 per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Love
    I love FirstIB. I've been a customer since shortly after they started.

    All I've got...
  • Beam Me Up Scotty Banks
    The long term issue with pure play internet banks is their dependence on deposits and loans that tend to be priced higher and without a more local client base which is a provider of less expensive core deposits the cycle is hard to break. BANKALCHEMIST.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.

ADVERTISEMENT