Fiscal cliff deal threatens Indiana co-op health plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Last week’s fiscal cliff bargain in Congress dealt a potentially fatal blow to a new health insurance plan that was set to launch this year.

The deal in Congress killed funding for new co-op health insurance plans created by the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The co-ops, called Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans in the act, were supposed to provide not-for-profit alternatives to existing health insurers across the country.

In Indiana, an organization called Remedy Indiana had asked the federal government for $62 million in loans to launch its health insurance plan. The organization, led by Indianapolis physician Ned Lamkin, has letters of support from all of the state’s major hospital systems—such as Indiana University Health in Indianapolis and Deaconess Health System in Evansville—to participate.

Some employers and benefits brokers also were involved in Remedy Indiana’s plans.

Lamkin said he expected a funding decision from the Obama administration in the first quarter, which would have allowed Remedy Indiana to start offering its plan to employers by the end of 2013. Remedy Indiana already had managers lined up to run the organization.

“It was a shocker for everyone,” said Lamkin, CEO of Remedy Indiana. “It is very discouraging to get so far along and then have the rug pulled out from underneath us.”

Remedy Indiana’s goal is to shift the task of managing patients’ health away from health insurers and back to hospitals and physicians—saving significant money by eliminating waste.

In the short-term, Remedy Indiana planned to save money by getting rid of the need for large profits, fat executive salaries and insurance programs that, in Lamkin’s words, are more focused on making profits than on benefiting patients.

In the long-term, Remedy Indiana planned to convene physicians from all its participating health systems, by specialty, to analyze cost, quality and research data to find better ways of treating patients for less money.

“In collaboration with the health systems, we thought it was too good a chance to make a difference,” Lamkin said.

Lamkin, who also is president of the Indiana Employers Quality Health Alliance, isn’t giving up. He noted that the National Alliance of State Health Co-ops is working on Capitol Hill to get Congress to reconsider the halt of co-op funding—which received no debate before its inclusion in the fiscal cliff deal that passed the Senate 89-8 on Jan. 1.

Lamkin said he's also considering other funding options. For example, he will ask Indiana’s hospital systems to consider funding Remedy Indiana on their own. Many hospitals, such as IU Health, St. Vincent Health, Community Health Network and the Suburban Health Organization, already are considering offering or expanding provider-led health plans.

“They basically could assume responsibility for what they do. Right now, they have health plans battering them over the head,” Lamkin said.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  2. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

  3. I was visiting Indianapolis last month, and I was really, really surprised at how many panhandlers in Indy used signs. I currently live in Knoxville, and probably only one in 20 has a sign. They're still there panhandling, just no sign. I think I prefer the signs.

  4. For the record - the Kincaid's also own and operate the Fishers Banquet Center in the 96th & I-69 quadrant. The facility is mediocre at best. And there was a recent article stating they filed bankruptcy. Why are we wasting more money on a property just because it's a certain age to a family who can't run a business without running it to the ground and filing bankruptcy? I don't live in Hamilton County any more but if I still did I wouldn't have put any money towards them. It's a waste. Bull doze it down. The Kincaid's want the money to fund them for their mishaps with filing bankruptcy.

  5. Any estimated opening dates for Giordanno's?