Five individual insurers leaving Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Five health insurers—including two of the nation’s largest—have decided to stop selling individual health insurance policies in Indiana—a trend that prompted the Indiana Department of Insurance to request a phase-in of key parts of the 2010 health reform law.

Hartford-based Aetna Inc. and Philadelphia-based Cigna Corp., which are the third- and fifth-largest health insurers respectively, have announced their departure from Indiana’s individual health insurance market.

In addition, Illinois-based Pekin Insurance, Michigan-based American Community Mutual Insurance Co. and New York-based Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America also have decided to leave the individual market. The five companies covered more than 20,000 Hoosiers, or about 10 percent of all those who have individual health insurance.

Their major complaint is about the new health law’s requirement that at least 80 percent of premiums be spent on medical bills. That new rule, known formally as a medical loss ratio or MLR, takes effect this year for all individual policies the insurers hold, not just new policies.

The insurers argue that the marketing and administrative expenses on individual policies are so high that they cannot transition so quickly to the new standard.

The Indiana insurance department worries more health insurers may follow—particularly small, local insurance plans and insurance plans operated by health care providers. One example of such a plan is Indianapolis-based Advantage Health Solutions, which is owned by four hospital systems, including St. Vincent Health and Franciscan St. Francis Health.

So Insurance Commissioner Stephen Robertson asked the Obama administration in May to grant Indiana a waiver that would delay the 80-percent rule until 2014. In late July, the insurance department disclosed the letters of withdrawal from the five insurers and a sixth from an insurer contemplating an exit.

“The imposition of the MLR requirement effective January 1, 2011, would be disastrous to many individual health insurance companies, their customers, and their employees,” Michael Abbott, CEO of Iowa-based health insurer American Enterprise Group, wrote in a Nov. 22 letter to Robertson.

He noted that, if companies such as his leave the market, customers with pre-existing conditions could be left without coverage until the health reform law requires that insurers take all applicants in 2014.

“By deferring the effective date to 2014,” Abbott recommended, “insurance companies will have the opportunity to renegotiate commission contracts, adjust pricing, modify existing products to comply with the new laws and regulations, and generally prepare to compete in the new environment.”

That is exactly what the Indiana insurance department is now trying to do.

The individual insurance market is already highly concentrated in Indiana, with Indianapolis-based Anthem, a subsidiary of WellPoint Inc., claiming about 65 percent of the market; its nearest competitor, Golden Rule Insurance Co., a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, covers about 10 percent.

Only 44 of the 63 health insurers operating in Indiana last year had been meeting the 80-percent threshold. The health reform law will enforce the rule by requiring insurers to refund customers’ premiums until their medical bills each year equal 80 percent of premiums.

If the refunds had been required last year, Indiana’s health insurers would have had to give back nearly $30 million, according to insurance department data.


  • Look who doesn't know what their talking about
    So Hoosierconsumer you say that it shouldn't take an insurance company 20% to take care of the administrative side of providing insurance to consumers...huh? Interesting but apparently you've never been in business of any kind...I don't work for an insurance company and agree they make TOO MUCH PROFIT but 20% is unrealistic. Look at a restaurant, do you know how much their cost is for the food you receive? On average it is 25-30% of their overhead. So if a restaurant were to provide you food for 80% they would all go out of business! Take a business course at a college before you act like you know how much it cost to operate a business!!
    Five Health insurers want to spend more than 20% of your premiums on administrative costs (e.g., multimillion dollar executive bonuses) and the Indiana Insurance commissioner is in bed with them, helping them to get an exemption from a law that insists that 80% of premium be spent on (here's a new concept) ACTUALLY PAYING FOR HEALTH CARE and you're criticizing Obama? You must be an insurance company executive. Either that or a complete idiot.
    • Health Insurance
      Shortly, it will be just Anthem and be ready for the 30% + rate increases everywhere. Obamacare scares everyone...idiots and thanks to the liberals, we won't be able to afford coverage. Wait a minute, medicaid will take care of us. Won't have to work since welfare will also take care of us. Living the dream.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

      2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

      3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

      4. Exciting times in Carmel.

      5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1