Flaherty nears deal for Cosmopolitan investment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The developer of downtown's Cosmopolitan on the Canal apartments is nearing a deal to sell a stake in the building to an investor in a move that could free up capital to launch a $24 million second phase.

Locally based Flaherty & Collins Properties is working on a deal that would bring in an out-of-state institutional investor as an owner/partner, said CEO David M. Flaherty. He declined to name the investor or offer any details of the deal including price, citing a nondisclosure agreement. He said Flaherty would continue to manage the property.

Flaherty said there's no shortage of investors for "multifamily urban infill" projects like the Cosmopolitan.

"It creates interest among players that may not normally have an interest in Indianapolis," Flaherty said. "People are looking at our city that may not have looked at it in the past."

The investment won't necessarily be tied to a second phase for Cosmopolitan, but that is a possibility, Flaherty said.

Flaherty & Collins in June hired the local office of CB Richard Ellis to begin marketing the property without an asking price, seeking either to sell it outright or to bring in an equity partner.

The 218-unit apartment community has a parking garage and ground-level retail. The project—which is bordered by the Central Canal, Senate Avenue, Michigan Street and North Street—cost more than $33 million to build.

Flaherty & Collins already owns the adjacent, triangle-shaped parcel bordered by Michigan Street and Senate and Indiana avenues, and has developed plans for 162 additional apartment units and 5,365 square feet of commercial space

Offering materials noted the Cosmopolitan's upscale health and fitness center, yoga and pilates studio, salt-water infinity pool and grilling area, indoor/outdoor aqua lounge and attached parking garage with 342 spaces.

It says about 10 percent of residents earn more than $150,000, and "numerous" residents earn more than $500,000. Another selling point is the potential for rent growth of 6 percent or more per year, given the high demand for Cosmopolitan apartments.

Flaherty has been bumping up monthly rents, which range from $1,000 to $2,500, as terms expire, and would charge more initially for new units in a second phase, Jim Crossin, the company's vice president of development, told IBJ in February.

The first phase of Cosmopolitan had been set for completion by 2009, but a devastating fire in March 2009 delayed the opening by about a year.

The 16,000 square feet of commercial space on the first floor of Cosmopolitan has been less of an overnight success, though the branding and advertising firm Three-Sixty Group agreed in February to take about 5,000 square feet and move from its current home in the Century Building.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now