IBJNews

Foreclosure sought for downtown's Century Building

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The lender to the owner of the historic Century Building in downtown Indianapolis is seeking to foreclose on the property, claiming it’s owed $10.5 million on a loan default.

Minneapolis-based U.S. Bank filed Feb. 8 in Marion Superior Court to foreclose on the seven-story building at 36 S. Pennsylvania St. The owner is Century Building Investment Group LLC, a unit of California-based Blue Real Estate.

The building, built in 1901, is the corporate home of Steak n Shake, ExactTarget and Denison Parking.

Blue Real Estate, which entered the Indianapolis market as an investor in 2006, lost most of its local holdings last year after lenders took control of several properties.

In September, Blue surrendered its 360,000-square-foot, seven-building portfolio in Park 100 after defaulting on a $17.5 million loan affecting six of the seven buildings. Blue bought the collection of mostly office/flex space from Duke Realty Corp. in 2007 as part of a move into Indianapolis that began with the purchase of four Castle Creek office buildings in 2006.

Along the way, it scooped up a 17-building, 800,000-square-foot portfolio in Park Fletcher and acquired the Century Building. By late 2008, family-owned Blue controlled 1.6 million square feet of real estate in the Indianapolis area valued at about $120 million.

But, in early 2011, the Castle Creek buildings and the Park Fletcher portfolio came under the control of firms working on behalf of the lenders that held the debt on the properties.

U.S. Bank claims in its Century Building foreclosure suit that Blue received a loan in December 2006 from original lender Countrywide Commercial Real Estate Finance Inc. in the amount of $8.5 million.

U.S. Bank assumed the loan in June 2008, and alleges in its suit that Blue defaulted on the loan when its started missing payments in July 2011.

The unpaid principal on the mortgage still is about $8.5 million, or nearly the total amount of the original loan. But U.S. Bank is seeking $10.5 million, including interest charges and payment penalties.

U.S. Bank is requesting that the court appoint a receiver to manage the property during foreclosure proceedings.

Indianapolis-based Summit Realty Group is the leasing agent for the Century Building. The firm is named as a defendant in U.S. Bank’s suit, but only because it “claims or may claim a right or interest in the real estate that is subordinate to plaintiff’s,” according to the complaint.

Phone calls from IBJ to both Summit and Blue Real Estate were not returned Wednesday morning.
 
The Century Building contains 115,426 square feet of rentable space, ranking it as the 22nd-largest office buiding in downtown Indianapolis, according to IBJ statistics.

The latest figures available show the building was 89-percent occupied at the end of 2010.

Rents range from $16 to $17.50 per square foot, which is at the low end of downtown lease rates.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT