IBJNews

California firm's Park 100 portfolio goes back to lender

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

California-based Blue Real Estate lost the last big chunk of its Indianapolis portfolio last week when a lender took control of Blue’s 360,000-square-foot, seven-building portfolio in Park 100.

Blue bought the collection of mostly office/flex space from Duke Realty in 2007 as part of a move into Indianapolis that began with the purchase of four Castle Creek office buildings in 2006.

Along the way, it scooped up a 17-building, 800,000-square-foot portfolio in Park Fletcher and the Century Building downtown at 36 S. Pennsylvania St. By late 2008, family owned Blue controlled 1.6 million square feet of real estate here valued at about $120 million.

Blue still owns the Century Building, but earlier this year the Castle Creek buildings and the Park Fletcher portfolio came under the control of firms working on behalf of the lenders that held the debt on the properties.

That’s the case with the Park 100 portfolio, which is about 40 percent vacant. Blue defaulted on a $17.5 million loan affecting six of the seven buildings, according to a foreclosure lawsuit filed by Bank of America last February.

CW Capital, a special servicer of commercial debt, is now in control of the property and Jones Lang LaSalle is set to take over leasing of the Park 100 space from Summit Realty Group, sources told IBJ.

Jake Sturman, a broker and senior vice president at Jones Lang LaSalle, wouldn’t comment on his firm’s involvement. But it appears Jones Lang LaSalle is picking up responsibility for one former Blue property after losing another. It handled leasing of Blue’s Park Fletcher portfolio until June, when Blue lost the property and CB Richard Ellis was hired to take over leasing.

Summit, likewise, is holding onto some of its former Blue portfolio. The company lost responsibility for leasing the Park 100 property as of Sept. 30, but is still in charge of leasing at the 320,000-square-foot Castle Creek portfolio, which Blue lost about six months ago.

Rich Forslund, a senior vice president and office broker at Summit, said he and Summit’s Matt Langfeldt were hired by Blue to lease the Castle Creek office space about 2-1/2 years ago. Now they work for LNR Partners, a special servicer of commercial mortgage-backed securities that controls the property. He said the four-building portfolio is about 75 percent occupied.

Forslund said lenders and special servicers seem to be hanging onto properties longer before unloading them. “Now they’re hiring brokers to get more creative with the assets” before selling them, he said.

Sturman agreed. “The fire-sale mentality has changed,” he said. “They’re taking a longer term approach to protect or increase asset value.” Sturman said it’s not unusual for a lender or special servicer to hold onto a property for a year or two to improve value.

Commercial real estate observers told IBJ earlier this year that part of Blue’s problem was that it bought here at the height of the market. The recession brought downward pressure on rents that the company couldn’t withstand.  

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT