IBJNews

California firm's Park 100 portfolio goes back to lender

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

California-based Blue Real Estate lost the last big chunk of its Indianapolis portfolio last week when a lender took control of Blue’s 360,000-square-foot, seven-building portfolio in Park 100.

Blue bought the collection of mostly office/flex space from Duke Realty in 2007 as part of a move into Indianapolis that began with the purchase of four Castle Creek office buildings in 2006.

Along the way, it scooped up a 17-building, 800,000-square-foot portfolio in Park Fletcher and the Century Building downtown at 36 S. Pennsylvania St. By late 2008, family owned Blue controlled 1.6 million square feet of real estate here valued at about $120 million.

Blue still owns the Century Building, but earlier this year the Castle Creek buildings and the Park Fletcher portfolio came under the control of firms working on behalf of the lenders that held the debt on the properties.

That’s the case with the Park 100 portfolio, which is about 40 percent vacant. Blue defaulted on a $17.5 million loan affecting six of the seven buildings, according to a foreclosure lawsuit filed by Bank of America last February.

CW Capital, a special servicer of commercial debt, is now in control of the property and Jones Lang LaSalle is set to take over leasing of the Park 100 space from Summit Realty Group, sources told IBJ.

Jake Sturman, a broker and senior vice president at Jones Lang LaSalle, wouldn’t comment on his firm’s involvement. But it appears Jones Lang LaSalle is picking up responsibility for one former Blue property after losing another. It handled leasing of Blue’s Park Fletcher portfolio until June, when Blue lost the property and CB Richard Ellis was hired to take over leasing.

Summit, likewise, is holding onto some of its former Blue portfolio. The company lost responsibility for leasing the Park 100 property as of Sept. 30, but is still in charge of leasing at the 320,000-square-foot Castle Creek portfolio, which Blue lost about six months ago.

Rich Forslund, a senior vice president and office broker at Summit, said he and Summit’s Matt Langfeldt were hired by Blue to lease the Castle Creek office space about 2-1/2 years ago. Now they work for LNR Partners, a special servicer of commercial mortgage-backed securities that controls the property. He said the four-building portfolio is about 75 percent occupied.

Forslund said lenders and special servicers seem to be hanging onto properties longer before unloading them. “Now they’re hiring brokers to get more creative with the assets” before selling them, he said.

Sturman agreed. “The fire-sale mentality has changed,” he said. “They’re taking a longer term approach to protect or increase asset value.” Sturman said it’s not unusual for a lender or special servicer to hold onto a property for a year or two to improve value.

Commercial real estate observers told IBJ earlier this year that part of Blue’s problem was that it bought here at the height of the market. The recession brought downward pressure on rents that the company couldn’t withstand.  

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT