IBJNews

Former tech darling Vontoo acquired by Ohio firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Vontoo Inc., a once-promising Indianapolis-based technology firm that landed millions in venture capital but failed to meet growth expectations, has been acquired.

The company, which helps marketers send audio messages to thousands of phones and to track responses, was bought by Troy, Ohio-based One Call Now for an undisclosed price, the companies announced Tuesday.

Walter Meyer, president and chief operating officer of Vontoo, said the company currently employs seven people. Six will remain at Vontoo's offices in Indianapolis at 8606 Allisonville Road. Meyer said he anticipates he will serve in a corporate role at One Call Now. Vontoo has more than 1,000 clients. The retailer HHGregg and the Boston Celtics are among the businesses that have hired Vontoo.

Vontoo was founded in 2005 by local angel investor Bob Compton, who was involved in launching and supporting several successful tech companies, including Software Artistry, Aprimo, ExactTarget and Interactive Intelligence. The company raised more than $5 million in venture funding in its first three years and grew its work force to about two dozen employees but couldn't hold its footing during the recession.

In 2009, Vontoo announced a restructuring in which Compton temporarily returned as president and CEO. He expanded message delivery to other formats, including interactive video. Last February, Vontoo raised $192,000 as part of a $300,000 offering. In 2008, 11 investors chipped in $1.85 million.

Compton declined to discuss the reasons for the sale, citing a confidentiality agreement.

One Call Now bills itself as the largest message notification provider, using voice, SMS text and email messages. Its customers include businesses, schools, municipalities and volunteer organizations. Vontoo is the company’s third acquisition in 12 months.

“This acquisition expands our customer base in the education and business markets,” One Call Now founder and CEO Leib Lurie said in a prepared statement.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT