IBJNews

Fortune Industries plans to exit PEO business

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Fortune Industries Inc. wants to exit the professional employer organization business in favor of becoming a skilled-nursing operator following the recent death of its founder.

Fortune Industries submitted its complicated restructuring plan late last month to the Securities and Exchange Commission for its review.

Under the unusual proposal, Fortune Industries would remain a public company and abandon its previous plan to be taken private.

The restructuring hinges on shareholder approval of a merger agreement with skilled-nursing operator Ide Management Group LLC of Greenfield.

The merger would be accomplished by giving IMG CEO Mark Ide shares in Fortune Industries. Founded by Ide in 1997, IMG owns or manages 20 skilled-nursing facilities in Indiana, Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin.

Carter Fortune, 70, majority shareholder of Fortune Industries, had been diagnosed with a potentially terminal disease before his death in late August, according to an SEC filing.

Fortune Industries disclosed Fortune’s illness as it worked on a sale of the business to CEP Inc., a holding company led by Fortune Industries CEO Tena Mayberry and Chief Financial Officer Randy Butler. The planned management-led buyout, which would have resulted in the business going private, valued the company at $30.5 million.

Under the deal, Carter Fortune’s ownership stake in the business would have shrunk from 60 percent to 20 percent.

Mayberry and Butler now plan to acquire those shares from Carter’s estate and use them to buy out Fortune Industries’ PEO subsidiaries, which would operate within CEP.

CEP would be privately held and based in Nashville, Tenn. Both Mayberry and Butler would no longer be a part of Fortune Industries.

Mayberry became CEO of Fortune Industries in January 2010 and previously had served a dual role as president of both Fortune and subsidiary Century II Inc., a Brentwood, Tenn.-based provider of human resources services.

Meanwhile, Fortune Industries on Friday reported annual earnings for the fiscal year ended June 30.

Company profit fell to $926,000, or 6 cents per share, from $1.3 million, or 9 cents per share, the previous fiscal year.

Revenue declined 5 percent, to $60.9 million.

Fortune Industries attributed the drop in revenue to the loss of two large clients.

Company shares rose 1 cent Monday morning, to 24 cents each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT