IBJNews

2013 Forty Under 40: Doran S. Moreland

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

“I will do my part in bringing fresh ideas and new voices to local politics.”

Age: 35

Owner, Exponent Strategies


Doran Moreland discovered political science at Indiana University. After graduating in 2000, his real education in politics began, working for Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson, then U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh.

For the past two years, his clients at Exponent Strategies have benefited from Moreland’s knowledge of the workings of government and his knack for building relationships.

His company helps clients navigate government regulations, offering policy analysis, communications advocacy and alliance development.

“I knew some of the relationships I had had and the policy work I’d done was worth something,” said Moreland, who graduated from Pike High School and is finishing a master’s in public affairs at IUPUI.

His company also works with West Lafayette-based DelMar Information Technologies in selling voting software that relies on voting centers instead of precincts.

As a special assistant to Peterson, Moreland accompanied the Democrat mayor throughout his day, seeing that issues that were raised would be directed to the right person in city government.

In 2004, Moreland joined Bayh’s office as central Indiana regional director, regularly visiting 26 counties as the senator’s representative.

“My job was to take the work being done on Capitol Hill and translate it, explain how it worked, to the community,” said Moreland.

He left in 2009 for the private sector. Moreland spent a year working in public relations, where he learned the practicalities of finding clients and billing for time.

He is on the board of the Indianapolis Public Schools Education Foundation, and is also involved with 100 Black Men of Indianapolis and the Center for Leadership Development.

His wife, Kristen Moreland, was recognized in the Forty Under 40 class of 2009. They have two daughters—Sloane, 4, and Quinn, 8 months.•


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT