IBJNews

2013 Forty Under 40: Linda Broadfoot

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

 

“My focus is on rebranding and growing the IPS Foundation and making sure it does have a true, visible, remarkable impact on Indianapolis Public Schools.”

Age: 37

Executive Director, Indianapolis Public Schools  Education Foundation

Ever since moving from Wabash to Indianapolis to attend Butler University, Linda Broadfoot has focused on ways to make Indianapolis better.

In college, that meant being active in organizations such as IndyParks and Keep Indianapolis Beautiful and activities that exposed her to areas of the city where students seldom travel.

After graduation, she took a job at Butler, then spent 12 years working her way up at Keep Indianapolis Beautiful, from director of parks initiatives to vice president for development and public relations.

During those years, she earned her masters of public affairs at IUPUI and thought about moving away from Indianapolis once her coursework was completed.

“But I decided to stay,” she said, “and do everything I can to make it the city I believe it can be.”

Broadfoot wanted a job that would make an impact. And in November 2011, she found one: executive director of the Indianapolis Public Schools Education Foundation. Her mission there is to connect community resources to the classroom.

In her first year-plus with the foundation, she’s engaged with donors to identify needs in IPS schools, helped booster clubs and alumni groups with specific initiatives, laid the groundwork for new projects to raise funds for technology in the classroom and started to rebrand the organization.

In the coming year, she’ll be out raising funds for projects such as installing wireless technology in school buildings and providing in-class technology for teachers and soliciting funds through donorschoose.org.

“For me, it comes back to love of our city,” said Broadfoot, who’s also active with the community-service groups Giving Sum and Indy-east Asset Development. “This is the center for everything else—for my neighborhood to be the neighborhood I want it to be, to have the amenities I want to have in this city, to draw great, educated urbanites downtown.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT