IBJNews

2013 Forty Under 40: Linda Broadfoot

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

“My focus is on rebranding and growing the IPS Foundation and making sure it does have a true, visible, remarkable impact on Indianapolis Public Schools.”

Age: 37

Executive Director, Indianapolis Public Schools  Education Foundation

Ever since moving from Wabash to Indianapolis to attend Butler University, Linda Broadfoot has focused on ways to make Indianapolis better.

In college, that meant being active in organizations such as IndyParks and Keep Indianapolis Beautiful and activities that exposed her to areas of the city where students seldom travel.

After graduation, she took a job at Butler, then spent 12 years working her way up at Keep Indianapolis Beautiful, from director of parks initiatives to vice president for development and public relations.

During those years, she earned her masters of public affairs at IUPUI and thought about moving away from Indianapolis once her coursework was completed.

“But I decided to stay,” she said, “and do everything I can to make it the city I believe it can be.”

Broadfoot wanted a job that would make an impact. And in November 2011, she found one: executive director of the Indianapolis Public Schools Education Foundation. Her mission there is to connect community resources to the classroom.

In her first year-plus with the foundation, she’s engaged with donors to identify needs in IPS schools, helped booster clubs and alumni groups with specific initiatives, laid the groundwork for new projects to raise funds for technology in the classroom and started to rebrand the organization.

In the coming year, she’ll be out raising funds for projects such as installing wireless technology in school buildings and providing in-class technology for teachers and soliciting funds through donorschoose.org.

“For me, it comes back to love of our city,” said Broadfoot, who’s also active with the community-service groups Giving Sum and Indy-east Asset Development. “This is the center for everything else—for my neighborhood to be the neighborhood I want it to be, to have the amenities I want to have in this city, to draw great, educated urbanites downtown.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT