IBJNews

Dueling Franklins iron out trademark dispute

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana-based Franklin College and Ohio-based Franklin University resolved their legal case last night, with Franklin University agreeing to take specific steps in its advertisements to distinguish itself from Franklin College.

The agreed judgment against Franklin University was negotiated yesterday by U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge Tim Baker, according to attorneys involved in the case. It is still awaiting the formal signature of U.S. District Court Judge William Lawrence before it becomes official.

The agreement will go into affect Aug. 3, affecting Franklin University’s marketing in the Indianapolis area. Franklin University must include the word “Ohio” at least once in all its advertisements, brochures and students recruiting efforts.

Franklin University cannot use the word “Indianapolis” or “Indiana,” and cannot merely refer to itself as “Franklin.” It also cannot use Web sites or e-mail addresses that contain the words” Indianapolis,” “Indiana” or “Indy.”

And perhaps most persnickety, Franklin University cannot use the Waters Titling font in its advertisements—which it currently is not using.

To make sure Franklin University complies with the agreement, it must provide Franklin College advance copies of any new marketing materials before releasing them. Franklin College will then have two days to object to any content in the ads or other materials.

Spokeswomen for the two schools said they could not yet comment on the agreement.

Franklin College sued Franklin University on July 6 in federal court in Indianapolis, asking for an injunction against Franklin University for trademark infringement.

Confusion over the two schools’ names sprung up this spring when Franklin University announced it would open a campus in Indianapolis. The 107-year-old, not-for-profit school leased office space in Castleton and began frequent print and radio ads.

But Franklin College said the marketing blitz was too close to Franklin College’s own branding.

Franklin College officials said they have received many calls, comments and e-mail messages asking why the school has changed its name or whether it has opened a satellite office for online courses. They also complained that the colors and clock tower in some Franklin University ads are strikingly similar to Franklin College’s logo.

Sherry Mercurio, a spokeswoman for Franklin University, said earlier this month that the school has been using its name in a “factual and consistent manner.”

The two schools have different missions. Franklin College is a liberal arts school that enrolls mostly 18-to-22-year-olds, nearly all of whom reside on its campus in Franklin, a city 30 minutes south of Indianapolis. The school has about 1,000 students.

Franklin University enrolls primarily working adults, whose average age is over 30. Many of its courses are taught online. Indianapolis is the first new U.S. market for Franklin University, which plans to expand in the Midwest and even in other countries. The school has about 11,000 students.

In an interview in June, Linda Steele, vice president of marketing for Franklin University, said the school never considered operating under a different name than Franklin in Indianapolis.

"The Franklin College issue came up and we really did have to take a step back and ask the question whether that is a showstopper," Steele said. "Obviously, we think not, because we chose to go forward."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT