IBJNews

Friends of Lincoln Collection raises $6.9M to care for artifacts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A group formed to support a prized collection of Abraham Lincoln artifacts has raised $6.9 million in its first six months.

The Friends of the Lincoln Collection in Indiana announced its fund-raising milestone Wednesday afternoon. The amount raised so far includes a $3 million grant from the Indianapolis-based Lilly Endowment. The group's fund-raising goal is $12.5 million.

The money will pay for the care and exhibition of the collection, which includes rare signed copies of the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery.

Highlights from the collection go on display at the Indiana State Museum on Feb. 12 and continue through July 25. (A second Lincoln exhibit from the Library of Congress called "With Malice Toward None" also opens Feb. 12 and runs through April 11 at the State Museum.)

Lincoln National Corp. began collecting Lincoln artifacts in 1928, when it was based in Fort Wayne. The company's headquarters moved to suburban Philadelphia in 1999. The collection is valued at $20 million today.

A year ago, a consortium of Indiana organizations was chosen to take over the collection. The consortium was led by the Indiana State Museum and Allen County Public Library, which has the documents and photographs available for in-person research. The collection eventually will be digitized for online use.

"There's no doubt that Abraham Lincoln holds a special place in the hearts of Hoosiers," said Ian Rolland, co-chairman of the Friends' fund-raising committee and retired CEO of Lincoln National.

The Friends group has raised money from individuals as well as several organizations, including AEP/Indiana & Michigan Electric, the English-Bonter-Mitchell Foundation, NiSource, the Dekko Foundation, the Indiana Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission, Indiana State Library, City of Fort Wayne, Parkview Foundation, McMillen Foundation, Wilson Foundation, Journal Gazette Foundation, Cole Foundation, Raker Foundation, Schneider Foundation, Auer Foundation, Steel Dynamics, Duke Energy, Old National Bank, Vectren and the Leona Group Foundation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT