IBJNews

Fundex settles trademark suit with game inventor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Fundex Games Ltd. has given up its rights to the game Chronology as part of its settlement of a trademark-infringement suit brought last March by local inventor Jane Ruemmele.

Ruemmele alleged in her lawsuit that Plainfield-based Fundex had sold numerous copies of the game, but hadn’t provided any royalty statements or payments since October 2008. She also alleged that the company continued to sell the game after its license agreement expired on March 31, 2008.

Ruemmele, a Marion County public defender, first licensed the game in 1995 through a company Fundex acquired in 2007.

In Chronology, players try to place historical events and inventions in their proper place in time. The first player to accumulate 10 cards in calendar sequence wins.
 

Ruemmele Ruemmele

Ruemmele said she was disappointed that she couldn’t strike a new deal with Fundex. “They were local and it would have been an easy way to do business.”

Nevertheless, she’s pleased with other terms of the settlement, and she’s working with a new publisher. Ruemmele hopes to see Chronology back in wide distribution before next Christmas, and possibly in electronic format.

Fundex was going to stop selling the game in any case, attorney Spiro Bereveskos of Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry, LLP said. “We worked out a deal to go our separate ways.”

Chronology is still on the market through Fundex. Ruemmele said the settlement allows the company to sell off what was already in the pipeline.

Notice of the settlement was filed last month in the U.S. District Court of Southern Indiana. Ruemmele declined to disclose financial details.

Fundex settled a similar lawsuit in October with the inventor of Phase 10, the world’s second-best-selling card game.

Michigan inventor Kenneth Johnson had accused the company in December 2008 of copyright infringement, trademark dilution, fraud, conversion and theft.

Details of that settlement were not available. Fundex still has rights to the game, which sells more than 3 million copies a year, second only to Uno.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT