IBJNews

Gannett just latest player to separate print, digital media

Associated Press
August 5, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The game of survival is on for newspapers, as Indianapolis Star and USA Today owner Gannett Co. on Tuesday became the most recent major media entity to say it will divide its print and broadcast divisions into separate companies.

As consumers continue to gravitate toward online sources of news and entertainment, newspapers are increasingly being asked to fend for themselves.

Gannett said its separation will leave the newspaper unit debt free and let both companies pursue growth and acquisitions more efficiently. But some observers see the rush to split less profitable print businesses from growing TV and digital operations as an ominous sign for the newspaper industry.

"To take a draconian view, over next 10 years a lot of newspapers could disappear or be much smaller print products," said Edward Atorino, an analyst with Benchmark Co.

As part of the move, Gannett also announced Tuesday that it will take full ownership of Cars.com for $1.8 billion, another sign of the increasing importance of digital properties.

Gannett's spinoff follows similar maneuvers by major operators such as Time Warner Inc. and News Corp. Earlier this week, the Tribune Co. completed a split with its division that publishes The Los Angeles Times and other newspapers.

The spinoff trend takes place amid a backdrop of declining newspaper revenue. As consumer tastes for digital content grow, advertisers continue to shift more of their spending online. Over the past half-decade, annual newspaper ad revenue has fallen 30 percent to $16.35 billion in 2013, according to Kantar Media.

Gannett's publishing arm will retain the Gannett name and include USA Today, 81 local U.S. daily publications and Newsquest, a regional community news provider in the United Kingdom.

The company touted the publishing unit as a debt-free company and said both entities will have "increased opportunities to grow organically across all businesses," as well as pursue strategic acquisitions.

CEO Gracia Martore said the "bold actions" will help increase value for shareholders "in today's increasingly digital landscape."

Benchmark Co.'s Atorino said the newspaper unit was "holding back the Gannett stock." But many other analysts say the recent rush to spin off print assets paints a dark picture for newspapers.

"Now, these stand-alone print companies won't have the profits to depend on from the broadcast companies," said Ken Doctor, a media analyst for consulting company Outsell. "For them, it's life without a parachute. They have to figure out how to make it completely on their own."

None of the spinoff print companies have very much debt, which is a positive, but they don't have any source of strong revenue growth either, Doctor added.

"Their only route is to continue to manage decline at the same time they're trying to find growth," he said.

Gannett acquired Belo Corp. last year for about $1.5 billion, nearly doubling the number of TV stations it controls. The deal raised talk of a split almost immediately as the broadcast division's dominance grew over the publishing wing.

Gannett's broadcasting and digital arm, which has yet to be named, will operate the company's 46 television stations and websites such as CareerBuilder. It will also include Cars.com.

Both companies will remain headquartered in McLean, Virginia. The broadcasting and digital company will trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The publishing business is also expected to trade on the NYSE.

Gracia Martore will serve as CEO of the broadcasting and digital company. Robert J. Dickey, currently president of Gannett's U.S. Community Publishing division, will become CEO of the publishing company.

If approved by the company's board, Gannett anticipates that the distribution of the new publishing business' shares will be completed by the middle of 2015.

Gannett is buying the 73 percent interest in Classified Ventures LLC, owner of Cars.com that it doesn't already own. Cars.com lets people compare vehicles online and connects them with sellers and dealers. The web site displays about 4.3 million new and used cars from nearly 20,000 dealers.

Gannett will finance the Cars.com transaction with available cash, approximately $650 million to $675 million in new senior notes and borrowings under its revolving credit agreement. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter.

Gannett's stock fell 1.3 percent Tuesday, to $33.84 per share. The stock is up about 16 percent since the beginning of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • beginning of the end for the Indianapolis Star
    It doesn’t take much vision to see that the Indianapolis Star doesn’t have much shelf life. The interesting question is what will replace it once Gannett tires of print and shutters the thinly disguised USA Today Indianapolis edition forever. I think Indiana University should publish the next Indianapolis daily newspaper as a hands on learning tool for its school of journalism students. It should be nonprofit, nonpartisan and cover local news. And it should honor the principles of the first amendment and freedom of speech as if Thomas Paine were alive and sitting on the board, including anonymous, registration-free public comments to any digital version. These are perilous times we live in. Indiana ought to secure its free press within our state borders, beginning with its ownership. We also ought to secure our coal and coal powered energy plants for later, emergency use. And we ought to take the State’s electricity off the national grid, like Texas, operating independently within our State borders and providing for the coal powered energy to keep it operational. This is a world in political transition. The things that matter to us should be secured within our borders, including an operational free press. Let Gannett go back to New York. It never served our greater interests.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

ADVERTISEMENT