IBJNews

General Growth still backing Brookfield despite new Simon bid

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

General Growth Properties Inc. backed the latest financing proposal from a group led by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. in court Friday, rejecting Simon Property Group Inc.’s “best and final” offer.

The Brookfield-led plan is better than Simon’s, General Growth President Thomas Nolan said in testimony read in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan Friday. Lawyers for Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, said the company will withdraw from bidding if U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper approves the Brookfield plan, partly because the stock warrants that accompany it would make Simon’s buyout more expensive.

General Growth stock fell as much as 13 percent Friday in New York trading.

Under the revision introduced Friday, Brookfield’s investment partner Pershing Square Capital Management LP would forgo any warrants until General Growth’s reorganization is complete, and Toronto-based Brookfield would increase the strike price on its warrants to $10.75 from $10.50, General Growth lawyer Marcia Goldstein told Gropper. Another partner, Fairholme Capital Management LLC, also would get warrants.

The hearing comes a day after Indianapolis-based Simon stepped up its three-month quest to acquire General Growth by making a $6.5 billion bid for the Chicago-based company. Brookfield’s rival proposal would leave General Growth an independent company.

Simon’s offer is valued at $20 a share, the company said Thursday in a statement. It consists of $5 in cash, $10 in shares of Simon stock and the distribution of shares in a new company, General Growth Opportunities, valued at $5.

“These offers are best and final,” Simon CEO David Simon said in a letter to General Growth’s board. Simon “will not participate in the bidding process in the GGP bankruptcy proceeding in any way once GGP commits to issue the warrants associated with the latest Brookfield-sponsored plan.”

Pershing Square’s CEO William Ackman responded Friday with a letter to the General Growth board offering to forgo 17 million interim warrants. Ackman made the offer in an effort to push through Brookfield’s plan, saying Simon’s bid posed antitrust risks because it would link the nation’s two largest mall owners.

Simon estimates the warrants could cost General Growth shareholders $895 million. Ronen Bojmel, a managing director at General Growth’s financial adviser Miller Buckfire & Co., testified Friday that they would be worth about $688 million.

Simon’s original bid on Feb. 16 would have given General Growth stockholders $9 a share, including $6 in cash. That was turned down as too low. Both that plan and the new one pay all General Growth unsecured creditors, who hold about $7 billion in debt, in full.

General Growth filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April 2009 after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its properties include New York’s South Street Seaport, Boston’s Faneuil Hall and the Grand Canal Shoppes and Fashion Show in Las Vegas.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is a big help. Thanks for share it here.

  2. Doug Henning!

  3. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  4. Magician and illusionist!

  5. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

ADVERTISEMENT