IBJNews

Gloomy outlook for medical device makers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The next four years could be rough for makers of medical devices, such as Bloomington-based Cook Medical Inc., and the Warsaw-based makers of orthopedic implants Zimmer Holding Inc. and Biomet Inc.

And it’s not because of the 2010 health reform law.

According to projections by Deloitte Consulting LLP, health reform’s new taxes on medical device makers will be roughly offset by new business from the law’s expansion of consumers with health insurance.

But medical device makers as a whole will lose 10 percent of their current revenue by 2015, according to Deloitte analysts Sanjay Behl, Terry Hisey and Ralph Marcello. That’s because indirect changes in the health care marketplace are going to shift market power from producers of medical products to hospitals and large physician groups, which will be under tremendous financial pressure from health plans and consumers to save costs.

And the health care providers will be armed with enormous amounts of data—from their electronic medical record systems—to show which products are helping them do so and which are not.

Not only that, but now that hospitals are employing more and more physicians, they are no longer allowing, say, each orthopedic surgeon to chose his or her favorite implants. Instead, those purchasing decisions are made as a group, allowing hospitals to command lower prices and often shutting out some brands of implants entirely. The same goes for stents, pacemakers and other kinds of devices.

“The impact of health reform on medical devices comes primarily from pricing pressure as physicians lose purchase decision-making power especially over devices that are more readily substituted,” wrote Behl, Hisey and Marcello in an article in Deloitte Review research journal. “Hospitals and patients will increasingly make decisions about these products.”

That means medical device companies, instead of sending sales people around the surgeons' offices, will increasingly have to make bids to the centralized purchasing officials of hospitals and large physician groups.

“As their products get more commoditized, life sciences companies can soon be dealing with the procurement department or medical administrator,” the Deloitte analysts wrote. “However, most manufacturers may not be structured to compete on price.”

The Deloitte analysts suggest one strategy for medical device makers: pitch not merely products, but solutions, by bundling all manner of support services into a contract to supply devices to a hospital. The only problem with that, however, is that services profit margins run about 40 percent, compared with the 90-percent margins of most medical devices themselves.

And that’s why Deloitte concludes the medical device makers cannot avoid a big hit to their revenue.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT