GOP governors: EPA carbon dioxide rules job killer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republican governors from oil-and-gas rich states said Monday that new federal rules designed to cut emissions linked to global warming from power plants by 30 percent by 2030 will kill jobs and growth.

Governors signing the letter were Sean Parnell of Alaska, Mike Pence of Indiana, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Phil Bryant of Mississippi, Pat McCrory of North Carolina, Jack Dalrymple of North Dakota, Tom Corbett of Pennsylvania, Rick Perry of Texas and Matthew H. Mead of Wyoming.

Mead, whose state produces the most coal in the country, said he — like the others — will use a public comment period to express reservations and hope that the Environmental Protection Agency will make satisfactory changes to the rules before they become official. Wyoming currently has 11 outstanding lawsuits against the federal agency and will not hesitate to challenge these rules in court if necessary, he said.

"We view this as a problem for Wyoming," Mead said.

The letter to President Barack Obama on Monday says data shows "millions of jobs will be lost and billions of dollars will be spent" to comply with the regulations to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and other federal rules. All nine governors who signed the letter are Republican.

Carbon dioxide is the chief gas linked to global warming from U.S. power plants.

But Dalrymple, whose state has enjoyed unprecedented economic growth due to a recent oil drilling boom, said he and Mead recently met for breakfast with EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and told her that there was no feasible and economic way to capture carbon dioxide at this time. They questioned how the states are expected to make the necessary cuts to comply with the regulations.

"She talked about fuzzy things about conservation" and more efficient coal plants, Dalrymple said. "I was not satisfied with the answer."



  • Reality
    Did someone just say 'the reality of climate change' hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
  • data vs opinions
    Perhaps you should turn off the Fox (lies and distortion)network and cease spouting gibberish. The coal industry is a minor (and decreasing) employer in America, lots of jobs are being created for building and operating alternative power generation facilities. GDP growth is better in the US at present than in most of the rest of the developed world. Our stock market is at a record high; S&P 500 companies have record profits and cash balances (which many are not investing) and the 1% continue to receive an increasing share of all US economic growth. If you are not participating in the benefits of this growth, then perhaps you should direct your complaints to Obama, Boehner et al. If your health is being negatively impacted by the poor air quality in Indiana then demand that the EPA close down the 50+ year-old coal-fired power stations that are the largest air pollution source in Indiana.
  • re: Todd's strawman argument
    Sorry to be a tool, but there isn't much point in having a booming economy if the cost is the health and well-being of the citizenry (not to mention all of the other living things on the planet, to which you attribute absolutely no value). And I somehow doubt that the reason our economy isn't booming (although the markets seem to differ) is because of restrictions on carbon emissions. If we need oil and coal jobs to keep the country afloat in the modern age, then we are truly, seriously in trouble.
  • Knee Jerk Again
    I would venture a bet that Pence did not look at the whole picture, but rather voiced the concerns of those folks who have money in the game and don't want to adapt to the reality of climate change. Where is the thoughtful investigation of how to achieve the goals and create the jobs that would flow from the new law?
  • a dose of reality
    Capturing CO2 from coal-fired power plants is being done successfully for years - so yes it is technically feasible. But there are only a few very small commercial markets for the captured CO2 so the process is not economically viable. This will not save the coal industry. The EPA proposal lets states decide how to reduce their CO2 emissions from power plants by closing older units, switching to natural gas, wind or solar power generation (already of these are already happening) or by encouraging energy conservation (replacing lights bulbs is very cheap and effective). Indiana has already reduced our CO2 emissions by 20% since 2005 - which is two thirds of the reduction proposed by the EPA for us by 2030. I doubt that the majority of Hoosiers even noticed this reduction - except perhaps for the jobs created by installing wind and natural gas power generation facilities. Do not waste time listening to Pence and these other windbags whine about the 'economic impact' of reducing CO2 emissions. There is already a measurable economic impact from reducing CO2 emissions for the last ten years - and it is more investment and more jobs.
  • Screw the enviroment
    "Cough" It seems these fools Cough" would happily let the "Cough...cough" earth become "cough" uninhabitable "Cough"

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...