IBJNews

Government cutting rates for hard-to-insure patients

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The government is cutting premiums by up to 40 percent in 17 states and the District of Columbia and implementing other changes to make it easier for people with pre-existing medical conditions to get health insurance.

Cuts in other states range from about 2 percent in Mississippi to 26 percent in Indiana.

The move Tuesday comes as enrollment in the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan continues to lag far behind expectations, often because people can't afford the premiums or find it too hard to meet enrollment requirements.

The insurance program, part of President Barack Obama's signature health care law, began last summer. It offers health insurance to people with medical problems at prices the average healthy person would pay, although that's not necessarily cheap.

So far, about 18,000 people have signed up — well short of government projections that some 375,000 people would gain coverage in 2010.

In her announcement, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said diseases like cancer, diabetes and asthma have pushed up health insurance costs for many, bankrupting families and leaving people's health at risk. She said those people who have been locked out of the market still have a place where they can get immediate coverage.

"This program changes lives and in many cases saves lives," said Sebelius. "We need to continue to find those who are eligible and get them covered."

Premiums will drop, Sebelius said, in the states where the federal government runs the plans directly. The remaining states have opted to take federal money and design their own programs.

Cuts of about 40 percent should be seen in Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nevada, and Virginia, according to HHS.

In Virginia, Sebelius said, consumers will save almost $1,200 a year from the premium reductions. The premium cuts are paid for by the $5 billion allocated to the program, HHS officials said.

For the states that run their own programs, federal health officials are sending out letters encouraging them to review their rates to make sure they are similar to standard rates for healthy people in the current insurance market.

Health and Human Services also is adjusting its eligibility standards in the states with federally run programs.

Beginning this July, people applying for coverage can simply provide a letter from a doctor, physician assistant or nurse practitioner, dated within the last 12 months, stating that they have, or have had, a medical condition, disability, or illness. Applicants will no longer have to wait on an insurance company to send them a denial letter.

The program will last until 2014, when the new health law requires insurers to accept all applicants regardless of medical history.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • the lie
    If people who sign up for this thinks it's free. Well, then I've got land in the everglades I'll sell you dirt cheap. It will cost you big time after all is said and done. Some people are just stupid and believe everything this bunch is feeding them.
  • THANK YOU
    Wow, no negative comments on this one? You would think that government mingling in a private industry would cause some issues. Unless everyone has finally realized that healthcare insurance is a necessity, and private insurers are only interested in profiting by raising rates and cutting coverage to the expensive patients who really need it most.
  • Good news
    This is great news. I was contemplating having to go entirely without insurance for the next 6 months, just to qualify for this insurance. Now I don't have to take such a risk. Thanks for the information!
  • ichia
    Will this effect the rates that people pay for being enrolled in ICHIA in the state of Indiana????

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT