IBJNews

Governors: Buzz about legalizing pot just smoke in most states

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

All the buzz at the National Governors Association meeting over legalizing pot, some say, is just smoke.

Nearly three months after Colorado began selling recreational marijuana, the nation's governors, including Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, are taking a cautious approach to loosening their drug laws despite growing support for legalization.

Republican and Democratic state chief executives who met in Washington, D.C., over the weekend expressed broad concern for children and public safety should recreational marijuana use spread. At the same time, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper is warning other governors against rushing to follow his lead.

He said he's spoken to "half a dozen" governors with questions about his state's experience, including some who "felt this was a wave" headed to their states.

"When governors have asked me, and several have, I say that we don't have the facts. We don't know what the unintended consequences are going to be," Hickenlooper said. "I urge caution."

The Democrat continued: "I say, if it was me, I'd wait a couple of years."

States are watching closely as Colorado and Washington establish themselves as national pioneers after becoming the first states to approve recreational marijuana use in 2012. A group is hoping to add Alaska as the third state.

Colorado became the first to allow legal retail sales of recreational marijuana on Jan. 1 and Washington is expected to launch its marketplace soon.

Hickenlooper confirmed that early tax revenue collections on Colorado pot sales have exceeded projections but cautioned that tax revenue "is absolutely the wrong reason to even think about legalizing recreational marijuana."

Medical marijuana, meanwhile, is legal in 20 states and the District of Columbia. Florida voters will decide on a proposed constitutional amendment to allow medical marijuana in November.

President Barack Obama's administration has given states the green light to experiment with marijuana regulation.

Obama recently generated headlines when he said in an interview that he didn't think marijuana was more dangerous than alcohol "in terms of its impact on the individual consumer." He said smoking marijuana is "not something I encourage, and I've told my daughters I think it's a bad idea, a waste of time, not very healthy."

Recent polling suggests that a majority of Americans support efforts to legalize the drug. The issue cuts across party lines as liberals and libertarian-minded Republicans favor the shift.

But governors gathered in Washington this weekend had a more cautious approach.

"I just had a longstanding belief that legalizing marijuana would not be in the interest of our youth or our people," said Indiana's Pence, a Republican. "And I'll maintain my position in opposition to legalization as long as I'm governor."

New Hampshire Democratic Gov. Maggie Hassan says she's opposed to legalization because her state already struggles with high rates of youth substance abuse. But she called for a "comprehensive look at our criminal laws and sentencing practices."

"I don't think we should be sending young people to jail or have a criminal record for a first offense," she said.

Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, a Republican, called legalization "bad public policy" with unintended consequences.

"It's a segue drug that I think ends up creating a lot more problems than it solves," Branstad said.

Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, a former Baltimore mayor whose city has dealt with drug addiction, said in a few years other states would know "whether Colorado was able to reduce harm without creating other adverse impacts unforeseen." But the Democrat noted that in Maryland, many job opportunities for young people come from federal agencies or firms with federal contracts that require employees to pass drug tests.

"I don't believe for economic and opportunity reasons that this is an issue where Maryland should serve as that laboratory of democracy," he said.

The Justice Department said last year that it would largely steer clear of state-legal marijuana businesses as long as they follow a series of strict guidelines. A department memo did not give carte blanche to would-be marijuana entrepreneurs, but the legal pot market viewed the department's position as encouraging.

Earlier this month, the Obama administration provided banks with guidance on how to do business with marijuana firms, aiming to make banks feel more comfortable working with marijuana businesses that are licensed and regulated.

Meanwhile, Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, said implementation of his state's decision to create a legal pot marketplace was succeeding. He also offered some advice to his fellow governors.

"I would encourage them to follow their state's will," he said. "Our will was to de-criminalize this product. And so far it's working well."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Smoke or Not...
    I do not smoke pot (marijuana). I did, a little, in college, but most of us did. As a matter of fact, I don't smoke anything else, and never have and, likely, never will. But, college was a a long, long time ago, and a lot has changed. This is not Leave it To Beaver Mayfield ca 1950's: times change. However, the criminal sentences for people who are caught with relatively small amounts of marijuana are certainly disproportionate to the severity of what they're doing. I'm not necessarily advocating for the legalization, or maybe I am, but I hate to see a child's or a young adult's life ruined for something this inane...
  • Cig Tax
    Low cig taxes will entice smoker states, but being from Colorado I can tell you cig taxes were minimal at best. Colorado is one of the healthiest states in the country and you rarely see anyone smoking cigs.
  • All about money
    This is so clear it amazing that anyone thinks this is about anything but recouping the lost cigarette tax as that revenue stream decreases for the government. Of course the Colorado governor wants other states to wait, then they can score even bigger tax dollars for a longer period of time. He didn't want to wait, but he wants other too? Really? Hard to read about this guy and not laugh at how stupid he thinks the general public is. But i guess he's the one laughing all the way to the bank...
  • Up in Smoke
    For Colorado, illegal drugs deals/violence hopes to be reduced...state is estimating $100 million in new revenue for schools and highway...more people employed ie: payroll taxes...pain management better controlled without addiction...what am I missing? Don't start on the abuse bandwagon here...better to discuss at a bar drinking booze!!!
  • political caution...
    is what they are saying. Most of them want to get re-elected and are afraid of supporting pot legalization until after the closest next election. Our own Gov. wants to run for president, so he wouldn't support pot if you paid him twice, plus he's so uninformed on the subject that he seems to still believe the 1970's hype and misinformation. I'm glad to hear many of the gov's are at least open minded and are wanting to discuss the issues with Gov. Hick....We are probably doomed to be last to legalize with our current Mr. do good Governor.
  • Wake Up!
    it needs to be legalized, PERIOD! there is not one valid argument to continue heading down the failed prohibition path we have been on the past 40 years. its based on lies! majority of people favor legalization, yet these morons won't even discuss it because they are one minded thinkers who don't understand reality. cops are fed up with it and having to waste there time when violence is out of control. it will be legalized eventually so why keep fighting it? people are waking up and realizing that the fight against pot is crap because they want people addicted to pain meds that line the pockets of politicians. wake up Indiana!!!! we have a very bad reputation as a state where we are taking steps backwards instead of forward.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT