Group pushing to make Center Grove a town

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The unincorporated area of Center Grove in Johnson County could become a town if its 29,000 residents can convince local officials to approve the plan by the end of the year.

Citizens for Center Grove, a not-for-profit leading the effort, is set to present its proposal for the new town at a public meeting at 7 p.m. Tuesday at the Center Grove Schools administration building.

The group has hired Indianapolis public accounting firm H.J. Umbaugh and Associates to study tax rates, which will be presented at the meeting.

It hopes to present a final proposal in July to county commissioners, who could vote on the plan within the following 90 days. The proposal would need approval from two of the three commissioners in order for Center Grove to become a town.

If successful, a town of Center Grove would be one of the largest towns in central Indiana, with a population greater than Zionsville, Plainfield, Brownsburg and Avon.  

Jody Veldkamp, a leader of the not-for-profit who has lived in the Center Grove area since 1992, said incorporation would enable residents to better control the 22.5 square miles that would comprise the town.

“What you tend to see happening is that the commercial corridor is being taken,” he said.

Veldkamp is referring to State Road 135, much of which has been annexed by Greenwood and Bargersville.

State Road 37, which also runs through the Center Grove area, is part of the Interstate 69 expansion proposal linking Evansville to Indianapolis, which could provide future commercial development, Veldkamp said.
The Center Grove area is bounded by Greenwood to the east, Bargersville to the south, County Line Road to the north and Morgan County to the west.

One potential roadblock to the incorporation is whether it can gain approval from Greenwood city officials, though Veldkamp anticipates that will occur. Because Greenwood is a city, it has the right to prohibit any town from incorporating within 3 miles of its border, according to state law.

Greenwood Mayor Mark Myers could not be reached for comment Monday morning.

Veldkamp’s group wants to incorporate as a town instead of a city because the only requirement would be the election of a five-person town council and clerk-treasurer.

If successful, the town would contract with the Johnson County Sheriff’s Department to provide police protection, which it already does. Fire protection would be provided by the existing White River Township Fire Department. Other necessary utilities already are in place, Veldkamp said.

The town would begin collecting tax money in January 2014, which would provide enough time to get organized and to hold an election in November 2013.

In the Indianapolis metro area, the last unincorporated area to become a town was Avon in 1995.

Incorporations, in fact, are quite rare, said Matt Greller, executive director and CEO of the Indiana Association of Cities and Towns. The group receives about five inquiries a year about the process, but new towns or cities only pop up about every five years, he said.

The biggest obstacle is money, said Greller, who coincidentally is a resident of the Center Grove area. His organization does not provide opinions on incorporations but simply guides organizers through the process.

“These come up in areas that are primarily residential, and a residential tax base usually doesn’t cut it,” he said. “That being said, I think the potential for that type of [commercial] tax base [in Center Grove] is there.”


  • Thanks
    Thank you Chris for your explanation.
  • State Annexation Law
    Hi Kevin, the law applies to all Indiana cities (there are some differences for Marion County/Indianapolis), not just Greenwood.

    The reasoning is to allow cities to have the option to expand their borders in order to provide a sustainable tax base and additional room for residential growth. Historically, many older cities ended up hemmed in by close-in suburbs and this prevented the cities from acquiring room for new residents or for growing their tax base. The intent was to avoid having cities feel pressure to annex unincorporated areas before the timing made sense just to get the jump before the target areas incorporated.

    • State Law, Greenwood as a city could block Center Grove?
      Can someone explain the reasoning behind why it is a law that a city (Greenwood) can block the incorporation of a town within 3 miles of its border?

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

      2. Shouldn't this be a museum

      3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

      4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

      5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.