IBJNews

Savings power of HSAs appears to wane

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As consumer-directed health plans become more prevalent, their power to save money for employers is waning, according to the latest survey by Indianapolis-based United Benefit Advisors, a network of health insurance brokers.

For the first time, employers switching from an HMO or PPO health plan to a consumer-directed health plan saw an increase in costs over the previous year, according to preliminary results from UBA's 2011 survey. The national survey included nearly 11,000 employers.

Costs in 2011 for new consumer-directed health plans were 2.1 percent higher than the cost of the 2010 plans employers switched from. Consumer-directed health plans, also called CDHPs, are a combination high-deductible health insurance and a health spending account, such as a health savings account or a health reimbursement arrangement.

"For the first time in more than seven years of reporting, CDHPs nationally did not create a savings over the clients' in-force plan prior to [annual] renewal," said Bill Stafford, UBA's vice president of member services. "As these plans become more prevalent, the percentage of savings has continually declined."

Switching to a consumer-directed health plan still made financial sense for employers, as the cost increase for all plans this year was nearly four times as high—8.2 percent, according to UBA's survey.

But employers already using CHDPs didn't see a great savings, either. The average CDHP renewed this year for costs 8 percent higher than last year, just a tick under the average for all plans.

Overall, consumer-directed health plans account for 23 percent of all employer plans offered and cover 17 percent of all employees. By contrast, HMOs cover 12 percent of all employees and PPO plans cover 64 percent of all workers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT