IBJNews

Health care software firm RealMed regains momentum

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Just a decade ago, RealMed Corp. was considered Indiana’s next big thing. Flush with tens of millions of dollars in venture capital, the maker of health care claims processing software talked openly about an initial public offering, brokered hefty government incentives, and promised to add 1,800 jobs.

RealMed’s work force peaked at 210 before falling as low as 91 during the decade’s first recession. After being acquired by a group of Blue Cross Blue Shield plans half a decade ago, RealMed fell off the radar.

The company maintained its low profile until 16 months ago, when it hired a new CEO, Phil Christianson, an attorney with an MBA whose last job was as a vice president of Minnetonka, Minn.-based UnitedHealth Group.

Once again, RealMed is signing up physicians by the thousands to use its system, and employment is up to 145. The clients are attracted to RealMed’s easy implementation and its ability to speed up the medical bill payment cycle—which helps doctors make ends meet during the economic downturn.

RealMed enjoys a nearly 99-percent renewal rate among its current customers and attracted 4,000 new doctors this year, Christianson said, taking its user count to 27,000.

Some hail from small practices with only a handful of physicians. Others are attached to huge hospital systems, like Clarian Health or Johns Hopkins University. Christianson said RealMed expects to add another 4,000 to 6,000 docs next year.

“We’re going to have our best year in 2009 in the company’s history,” he said. “The company was quiet for a few years because it was hunkering down and perfecting the application. … In the last year, 14 or 15 months, we’ve been more aggressive.”

Organic growth is taking RealMed places speculative venture capital never did. And even the threat of a major lawsuit hasn’t slowed the company down. In July, Salt Lake City-based competitor NetDeposit LLC slapped RealMed and four other companies with a complaint alleging infringement on NetDeposit’s patent for “electronic creation, submission, adjudication and payment of health insurance claims,” according to federal court records in Delaware.

But in early November, Delaware court records show NetDeposit withdrew the suit. Ian Forrest, NetDeposit’s legal counsel, said his company made an internal decision not to pursue the matter, but he wouldn’t elaborate why.

Just 10 days later, RealMed filed a countersuit in federal court here asserting it hasn’t infringed on NetDeposit’s patent.

RealMed General Counsel Scott Herbst said his firm won’t comment on the legal tussle, except to characterize it as “very minor.” RealMed would rather focus on the ground it has gained since hiring Christianson.

Industry experts are again starting to notice RealMed. For example, in June, Utah-based KLAS Research ranked RealMed No. 1 among 15 providers of claims-processing software it studied.

The study, which didn’t include NetDeposit, noted that other firms, such as Nashville, Tenn.-based Emdeon and Atlanta-based RealyHealth, still hold much larger market shares.

“RealMed delivers a superior client experience in terms of service, responsiveness and tools provided. Every respondent in this research had a positive outlook on RealMed,” wrote the KLAS report’s author, Mark Wagner. “Bottom line: RealMed is a small but growing vendor that handles growth pains very well.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT