IBJNews

Health care VC slows in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The number of deals and dollars invested by venture capitalists in Hoosier health care companies declined during the first half of the year, according to the latest data from Cleveland-based BioEnterprise.

Four companies attracted more than $10.5 million, according to BioEnterprise, which promotes the growth of life sciences companies in the Cleveland area.

Those results were down from 10 companies that attracted $18.5 million during the first half of 2010.

Indiana is part of a larger trend in which life sciences firms have increasingly found their next round of financing from a larger health care company, rather than from institutional investors.

“While the number of companies funded remains high and similar to prior years, the total dollars invested is down compared to recent years,” Baiju Shah, CEO of BioEnterprise, said in a prepared statement. “This is related to the significant increase in company M&A activity across the Midwest as growth-stage health care firms are increasingly being purchased in strategic transactions rather than pursuing additional financing.”

Across the Midwest, 86 companies have attracted $315 million in venture funding this year, compared with 75 companies that pulled in $412 million during the first half a year ago.

In Indiana, Carmel-based Dormir Inc. attracted $2 million in February to help its roll-up of sleep centers. Also, Indianapolis-based Wellfount Corp. received $6 million from Arboretum Ventures to help it install remotely controlled drug-dispensing machines in nursing homes around the country. And Fort Wayne-based BioPoly LLC secured $2.5 million to bring new orthopedic products to market.

Indiana’s numbers are somewhat low because Indianapolis-based BioCritica, which is licensing the severe sepsis drug Xigris from Eli Lilly and Co., also attracted venture capital, but the amount has not been disclosed.

To see the BioEnterprise report, go here.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!

ADVERTISEMENT