IBJNews

Health care venture capital swoons in Indy, holds steady statewide

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

The uncertainty of health care reform and a bad economy curtailed venture capital flow in 2009. That trend hit Indianapolis, but the rest of the state actually saw an increase.

In 14 deals, Hoosier companies pulled in a total of $76.3 million last year, a 1-percent increase over total investments the previous year, according to data released last month by BioEnterprise, a Cleveland-based life sciences development group.

In 2008, only seven health care companies in Indiana scored venture capital, but they averaged larger amounts of capital: $10.8 million per deal. In 2009, average investments fell by half, to $5.45 million per deal.

Around the Midwest, venture investing in health care companies fell 26 percent, to $780 million, according to BioEnterprise. The declines were similar nationally, according to an annual study by the National Venture Capital Association and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

“This was a difficult year for emerging health care ventures in the Midwest and nationally,” said Baiju R. Shah, CEO of BioEnterprise. “The global recession combined with the industry uncertainties related to U.S. health care reform dampened investment.”

Indianapolis, however, suffered even more. Companies in the metro area attracted $41.2 million last year—44 percent less than the year before. The number of deals rose from six to nine.

Two of those deals went to one company, Nico Corp., a medical-device maker that secured a total of $11.8 million in two rounds of financing.

Picking up Indianapolis’ slack was Endocyte Inc., the West Lafayette-based cancer drug developer. It raised $26 million last year.

Two other West Lafayette companies—Matrix-Bio Inc. and Kylin Therapeutics Inc.—pulled in small amounts of venture capital.

Also, Evansville-based Achieve CCA Inc., a medical-debt collection company, raised $5 million in its first round of financing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT