IBJNews

Health chief: Indiana needs more trauma center access

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Much of Indiana lacks the access to major trauma centers needed to treat victims of attacks like the one in Tucson that killed six people and left U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona and 12 others wounded, Indiana's health commissioner said Tuesday.

Commissioner Greg Larkin said that although many Indiana hospitals have emergency rooms that can treat simple gunshot wounds and other minor trauma, there are not enough hospitals with certified trauma centers.

Giffords, one of 13 people injured who survived the attack Jan. 8, arrived at an operating room within 38 minutes of being shot through the head and received care from an experienced team of surgeons and other health care workers. She has made remarkable progress and doctors have upgraded her medical condition from critical to serious.

Larkin said no hospital in western Indiana north of Evansville is prepared for similar trauma cases.

"She would not have had the chance to survive if she was campaigning in Gary or Terre Haute," Larkin told a meeting of the Indiana Rural Health Association. Giffords was meeting constituents outside a Tucson supermarket at the time of the shootings.

Indiana has certified trauma centers only at hospitals in Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, South Bend and Evansville. Severe trauma patients in heavily populated northwest Indiana must go to South Bend or to hospitals in Chicago, if the latter are willing to accept them, he said.

"In Indiana we don't have very good distribution," Larkin said.

Mel Burks, a Gary native and executive director of administrative services at Terre Haute-based mental health provider Hamilton Center Inc., said Larkin's remarks came as a "shock." He said the health care community in Terre Haute and across Indiana had a lot of work to do to upgrade trauma care.

But Larkin's comments didn't surprise Meredith Addison, a nurse at Terre Haute Regional Hospital and a past Indiana president of the Emergency Nurses Association.

"The facts hurt sometimes," Addison said outside the meeting. She applauded Larkin for bringing attention to the matter.

She said a large swath of western Indiana, from Vincennes in the south to Kentland near the Illinois border in the north, are more than an hour's travel away from a trauma center in either state. Larkin said doctors refer to that period as the "golden hour" of treatment for producing the best outcomes for gravely injured patients.

Some severely injured Indiana residents, depending on where they are hurt, can receive treatment at trauma centers in Chicago, Cincinnati and Louisville, but out-of-state hospitals are not obligated to accept them. Major trauma cases are expensive to treat, and patients may not have health insurance, Larkin said.

"Chicago is being very selective about which cases they're going to accept," Larkin said.

Larkin and Addison serve on a state trauma care task force that meets quarterly to study ways to upgrade Indiana's trauma care. Larkin said they don't know when they'll report back to Gov. Mitch Daniels, who created the panel by executive order in November 2009.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT