IBJOpinion

HETRICK: Here's a little ditty 'bout health insurance reform

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Bruce Hetrick

Just before Christmas, I received a nasty-gram in the mail from a firm called ORS.

ORS, I learned from the letterhead, stands for Overpayment Recovery Services, a firm based in Franklin, Tenn.

The letter said ORS is a division of AIM Healthcare Services Inc., also from Tennessee.

I looked up AIM on the Web. The home-page headline says: “AIM’s data-driven model directly connects payers and providers.”

It goes on to say: “We are in a unique position to see the entire ‘life of a claim’ from pre-admission on the provider-end to recovery from the payer perspective. Our experience and intelligence encompasses over 1,100 commercial and government payer clients representing 92-million member lives, as well as more than 1,700 hospital and health system clients.”

In other words, I had met Big Brother and he was in my mailbox.

The letter said ORS “has been contracted by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield [which is headquartered a few blocks from my Indianapolis home] to help resolve pharmacy claims that Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield paid at a time when you were not eligible for pharmacy benefits.”

Uh-oh.

Finally, to make sure I got all the weasel words and corporate-speak through my thick skull, the letter said: “This is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. This is a communication from a debt collector.”

Aha!

The charge in question is a whopper: $32.97 for insulin needles that cost me nothing out-of-pocket.

This all stems from closing my business and losing my company-funded Anthem health insurance on Sept. 30, 2011. That night at midnight, however, I went on my wife’s insurance plan. The insurer: Anthem.

A few weeks later, I needed a refill on my needles. Knowing there was no charge, I phoned in a refill, picked up the script, and thought nothing of it.

Naughty me.

So rather than look up my Social Security number and transfer the charge from one policy to another—or, heaven forbid, call me—Anthem decided to pay ORS, which is part of AIM, to collect $32.97 from itself. And to make it work, I had to play the Tom Cruise role in “Mission: Impossible.”

Along with the nasty-gram, you see, ORS sent me a page of instructions. If I wanted to dispute the $32.97 claim (which, given the premiums I pay, I did) ORS said I had to:

• Take a copy of their letter to the pharmacy that filled the prescription.

• Ask for a copy of my prescription profile.

• Send a copy of the profile and the ORS letter to my current insurance carrier’s claims department.

• Contact my current insurance carrier’s claims department for assistance in refiling the claim with them.

• Allow seven to 10 days for my current insurance carrier’s claims department to receive my claim, then nag them to make sure they’d received it and planned to pay it.

• Call ORS to tell them what my current insurance carrier’s claims department had to say.

• Wait 30 to 45 days for the claim to be processed.

• Once my current insurance company issued a refund check, deposit the check into my personal bank account.

• Send a personal check or money order to ORS for the amount due in full.

There was time pressure, too. Even though my current insurer (Anthem) was likely to take 30 to 45 days to write a check for my former insurer (Anthem), ORS, which is part if AIM, wanted me to know the consequences at hand: “Unless you notify this office within 30 days after receiving this notice that you dispute the validity of this debt or any portion thereof, this office will assume this debt is valid.”

Whoa.

On NPR the other day, I heard a story about the Affordable Care Act, that much-maligned legislation known affectionately as “Obamacare.”

The story discussed a provision in the law that says health insurance companies can’t use more than 20 percent of premium dollars for overhead and profit. In other words, 80 percent of my medical care dollars must go toward actual medical care.

If overhead and profit exceed 20 percent, health insurers must issue rebates to customers.

The story said many states are fighting this provision and that some insurance companies say they’re struggling to meet the 80/20 requirement by the 2012 deadline.

Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, the national lobbying group for insurance companies, told NPR, “The new regulation tries to make insurers responsible for rising premiums, when really the problem lies with doctors, hospitals, and drug and device companies.”

Hmm.

Knowing that Anthem is paying ORS, which is part of AIM, to collect $32.97 from itself—all while making the customer jump through hoops—perhaps the doctors, hospitals, drug and device companies (and, heaven forbid, consumers) would like to point the proverbial finger in the opposite direction.•

__________

Hetrick is an Indianapolis-based writer, speaker and public relations consultant. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT