IBJNews

HHGregg earnings sink on declining sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HHGregg saw a big drop in earnings in its latest quarter on decreased sales, lower profit margins and higher advertising expenses, the Indianapolis-based retailer said Monday.

The company reported earnings of $9.9 million, or 31 cents per share, for the fiscal fourth quarter, which ended March 31. That compared with $53.6 million, or $1.45 per share, in the same period a year ago.

Last year's quarter, however, included $39.6 million in earnings from a key-man life insurance payment. Adjusted earnings for year-ago period were $14.5 million, or 39 cents per share.

Revenue for the latest quarter fell 2.6 percent, to $597.6 million.

Analysts had predicted quarterly revenue of $623 million and earnings of 29 cents per share.

Comparable store revenue, which measures sales at stores open more than a year, fell 9.8 percent.

HHGregg continued to see declines in TV sales and increases in appliance sales. About 43 percent of the company's sales came from appliances in the latest period, compared to 37 percent a year ago.  Roughly 36 percent of the retailer's sales came in the video category in the last quarter, down from 43 percent last year.

The retailer saw double-digit comparable-store sales decreases in cameras, camcorders and small electronics, partially offset by increases in sales from mattresses, furniture and fitness equipment.

HHGregg predicted earnings per share for fiscal 2014 in the range of 75 cents to 90 cents and  sales growth in the range of 1 percent to 3.5 percent.

Shares in HHGregg closed Monday at $15.61 each, a 52-week high.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The Best
    If you wanna be the best, you gotta have the lowest prices in this day and age. It's too easy w/ technology to shop around. If you can't have the lowest prices for the same products then you won't make it.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT