IBJNews

HHGregg posts quarterly loss on poor TV sales, as expected

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Disappointing sales at stores open at least a year dragged Indianapolis-based HHGregg Inc. to a rare quarterly loss, the appliance and electronics retail chain said on Thursday.

HHGregg had posted a profit in its previous three quarters, and its latest loss is just the company’s third since going public in 2007.

For its fiscal first quarter ended June 30, the company lost $5.7 million, or 16 cents per share, compared with a loss of $800,000, or 2 cents per share, in the same period of last year.

HHGregg had anticipated the disappointing earnings. The company announced last month that it expected to report a wider first-quarter loss because of weak sales in its video business. It also cut its full-year outlook.

“As we announced in our pre-release, our first fiscal quarter proved to be more challenging than anticipated with sales and earnings coming in below our original expectations,” HHGregg CEO Dennis May said in a prepared statement. “During the company’s 57-year history, we have been successful in adapting our business to fit the changing needs of consumers, and remain confident in our ability to navigate through this difficult cycle.”

Same-store sales decreased 5.1 percent during the period after falling 0.7 percent in the previous quarter. It was an improvement over the year-ago period, when same-store sales fell 13.2 percent.

Same-store sales represent revenue from stores open at least a year and are considered a key measure of a retailer’s health.

HHGregg attributed the latest decrease in same-store sales to a double-digit decline in sales of flat-screen televisions and a low-single-digit decline in their selling prices.

Quarterly revenue increased 13.5 percent, to $489.9 million, compared to the year-ago period, due to the opening of 30 stores within the past year.

The company reaffirmed the reduction to its full-year outlook announced July 11. HHGregg expects earnings in the range of 90 cents to $1.05 per share for its 2013 fiscal year, down from its prior forecast of $1.12 to $1.27.

HHGregg said it expects its sales for the year will increase in the range of 3 percent to 6 percent, with a same-store sales decrease of 4 percent to 6 percent.

The electronics business has been tough in recent years, as HHGregg competes against big-box rivals like Best Buy, online retailers like Amazon.com and discounters like Walmart.

HHGregg operates 212 stores in 17 states.

Company shares rose a penny in early trading Thursday, to $6.81 each, but are down 40 percent since the beginning of July.




 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT