IBJNews

Hill-Rom's fourth quarter profit exceeds expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Hill-Rom Holdings Inc. topped analysts’ expectations as profit grew by double digits in its fourth quarter, the company announced late Wednesday.

The Batesville-based maker of hospital equipment reported profit of $26.4 million, or 42 cents per share, in the period ended Sept. 30.

The numbers excluded acquisition-related charges and marked an 11-percent increase from the same quarter a year earlier, when Hill-Rom earned $23.8 million, or 38 cents a share.

Analysts expected earnings of 28 cents per share. Revenue for the quarter fell 14.4 percent, to $363.3 million, compared with the same period last year.

Lower costs for commodities and other items offset the revenue decline, the company said. Hill-Rom also has been cutting costs, including moving manufacturing to low-cost regions, and diversifying its business.

“The global recession, uncertainty related to health care reform in the U.S. and health care spending pressures in other major countries continue to influence purchasing decisions of customers,” Hill-Rom President and CEO Peter H. Soderberg said in a prepared statement. “Accordingly, we have remained conservative regarding the speed of recovery.”

For its entire fiscal year, Hill-Rom reported a loss of $405 million, or $6.47 cents per share, compared with a profit of $67.1 million, or $1.07 per share, in fiscal 2008.

Revenue for the fiscal year fell 9 percent, to $1.3 billion.

Hill-Rom expects 2010 profit in the range of $124 million to $142 million, on revenue of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion, translating to earnings per share of between $1.20 and $1.36.

“Our outlook for 2010 contemplates low single-digit market growth, as well as some continued improvement in market share as new product introductions across the portfolio take hold,” Soderberg said.

Shares of Hill-Rom were up 7 percent, to $23.12, in Thursday morning trading.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Irvington is up and coming much like Fountain Square. We would love to have something like this in our neighborhood!

  2. Why do we care who has submitted proposals if we can't review the proposals? It's publicly owned land, but the public has zero say in what gets chosen to be built there. Yep, that sounds about right.

  3. Perhaps May 21 is "Evangelical Day" over at the IBJ?

  4. I don't know what's more depressing: that this passes for a defensible elective in a publicly funded SCIENCE class, or that more than half of the posters here are defending this charlatan. Intelligent design is creationism. Creationism is religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion, which deserves to be protected. Now someone kindly show Professor Hedin his freedom by escorting him over to the Religion department at BSU. Carry on.

  5. I hope people realize that the 'vocal' opposition at the meeting represent the minority of people against this project. As with any controversial project - those who don't want it are the loudest, while those who like it or really don't care one way or the other don't come to such meetings. Unfortunately the same may be true of the survey now being offered by the BRVA. I live less than a 5 minute walk from BR Avenue and can tell you that I and most of my neighbors are support this exciting project, or are ambivalent. And how great that it includes quality apartments - something that BR sorely lacks. This is a first class opportunity that we should embrace (and no, I'm not with the BRVA or the developer.) As for the fellow who owns the Good Earth store, if he doesn't want competition then let him pull together his own investors and out bid Whole Foods to operate the proposed grocery component! Come on folks - let's move ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT