IBJNews

Hofmeister files bankruptcy reorganization plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hofmeister Personal Jewelers Inc. plans to pay off its creditors over seven years as part of the well-known Indianapolis retailer’s bankruptcy restructuring.

Hofmeister filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in April 2011, listing assets of nearly $3.8 million and liabilities of $5.4 million.

According to court records filed Thursday, the jewelry retailer will begin annual installment payments Dec. 31 to PNC Bank, its largest creditor.

Hofmeister’s payments will begin at $150,000 and grow to $405,000 by 2019 as the store pays down about $1.8 million in remaining principal with the Pittsburgh-based bank’s Indianapolis office. Payments will include an additional 5 percent in interest.

The No. 2 secured creditor, Hearts on Fire Company LLC, will receive a total of approximately $443,000 over the same period. The company will not pay interest as part of an agreement with the ring and diamond vendor.

Unsecured creditors owed more than $2,500 each will receive payments in full, totaling about $500,000 over the seven years.

Meanwhile, unsecured creditors claiming they are owed less than $2,500 will receive 10 cents on the dollar at the end of 2012.

Hofmeister’s attorney Eric Redman, of Redman Ludwig PC, said the payments to the smaller creditors are being made in one lump payment instead of in installments as a convenience.

“It’s just not worth 70 people getting 10 bucks a year or some tiny amount,” Redman said.

The northeast-side jeweler, which has its primary location at 3809 E. 82nd St., owed almost $2.5 million to PNC when it initially filed for bankruptcy.

Redman said the payments to PNC thus far have come from sales, not new capital. The company has been working with a consultant to refinance its debts.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT