IBJNews

Hofmeister files bankruptcy reorganization plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hofmeister Personal Jewelers Inc. plans to pay off its creditors over seven years as part of the well-known Indianapolis retailer’s bankruptcy restructuring.

Hofmeister filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in April 2011, listing assets of nearly $3.8 million and liabilities of $5.4 million.

According to court records filed Thursday, the jewelry retailer will begin annual installment payments Dec. 31 to PNC Bank, its largest creditor.

Hofmeister’s payments will begin at $150,000 and grow to $405,000 by 2019 as the store pays down about $1.8 million in remaining principal with the Pittsburgh-based bank’s Indianapolis office. Payments will include an additional 5 percent in interest.

The No. 2 secured creditor, Hearts on Fire Company LLC, will receive a total of approximately $443,000 over the same period. The company will not pay interest as part of an agreement with the ring and diamond vendor.

Unsecured creditors owed more than $2,500 each will receive payments in full, totaling about $500,000 over the seven years.

Meanwhile, unsecured creditors claiming they are owed less than $2,500 will receive 10 cents on the dollar at the end of 2012.

Hofmeister’s attorney Eric Redman, of Redman Ludwig PC, said the payments to the smaller creditors are being made in one lump payment instead of in installments as a convenience.

“It’s just not worth 70 people getting 10 bucks a year or some tiny amount,” Redman said.

The northeast-side jeweler, which has its primary location at 3809 E. 82nd St., owed almost $2.5 million to PNC when it initially filed for bankruptcy.

Redman said the payments to PNC thus far have come from sales, not new capital. The company has been working with a consultant to refinance its debts.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT