Home insurers changing policies, raising premiums in wake of losses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Insurance carriers are dramatically altering the way they offer property and casualty coverage in Indiana, and in most cases, it’s costing homeowners.

The changes companies are starting to include in certain policies often translate to more out-of-pocket expenses when homeowners file a claim, as carriers attempt to rebound from years of losses in the property and casualty segment.

They’ve been hit particularly hard in Indiana in recent years by an unusually high number of hailstorms that left a slew of claims in their wake. Now they’re trying to recoup the losses by getting more creative with their policies—or simply raising rates.

focus-storm-ap-102813-15col.jpg Storms, like this one that blew through northwestern Indiana in 2010, have driven up property claims, and prompted insurers to raise premiums or cut back coverage. (AP Photo)

“I’ve been in this business 31 years and I’ve never seen it like this before,” said Larry Weaver, who operates the independent Weaver Insurance Group on the northeast side. “They’re losing their shirt on property insurance.”

Among the changes:

• Paying cash value for a damaged roof instead of the entire cost (minus the deductible) for a replacement. For example, an insurance company might pay only half the amount to replace a 10-year-old roof with hail damage.

• Increasing deductibles for homeowners who file more than one claim during a certain period of time. A deductible might rise from $1,000 to 1 percent of the policy’s value, or to $3,500 for $350,000 of coverage, for instance.

• Raising premiums on homeowners who want more than just basic coverage, such as something known as cosmetic damage coverage. Cosmetic damage affects only the appearance of a home, but doesn’t compromise its structure.

ahq-insurance-fever.jpgSometimes insurers make the changes without notifying policyholders, said Mark Gayer, vice president of personal lines at Gregory & Appel, and another 30-year veteran of the insurance industry.

A handful of Gayer’s customers have brought their homeowners’ policies to the local brokerage for review, pointing out a change that might show up on page four of a policy.

“They’re hiding things a little bit,” he said. “Every company is doing it differently.”

But Marty Wood, president of the Insurance Institute of Indiana, argued that the changes can actually save consumers money. By raising certain deductibles, insurers are able to avoid increasing premiums.

“I would not at all be surprised to some degree, for Indiana, that this is a reaction to some of the weather issues that have happened,” Wood said. “But a lot of it is the marketplace looking for that little edge.”

That means giving customers a discount if they drop, say, the cosmetic damage coverage from their policies, he said.

If so, Weaver, the independent insurance agent, isn’t seeing it. He said every one of his carriers has increased rates for property and casualty insurance in the past year. Increases have ranged from 9 percent to 32 percent.

“They haven’t charged enough; that’s competition-driven,” Weaver said. “And now they’re not worried about it.”

The state’s largest insurer, Bloomington, Ill.-based State Farm Insurance, is employing some of the changes.

It pays actual cash value of a damaged roof at the time of the loss and then will reimburse the customer for the agreed replacement cost if the repairs are made within two years of the damage, spokeswoman Missy Dundov said.

Customers who file what’s considered frequent claims will face more scrutiny. However, State Farm does not have a “hard-and-fast rule” that every customer will automatically be switched to a 1-percent deductible, Dundov said in an emailed statement.

“Some customers may be asked to implement a form of loss mitigation [to protect the home from future damage], some customers may be asked to accept a higher deductible, and some customers may not be renewed,” she said. “Each policy is handled on a case-by-case basis when reviewed for frequent claim activity.”

Most insurers will allow one weather claim in a three-year period, brokers said. But if a customer also submits a water, fire or theft claim, he’s a good candidate to be dropped.

As a broker, locally based Arlington Roe will help homeowners who have been dropped by their insurers search for new coverage.

“We’re seeing a big mix of carriers that are taking action,” said Janet Phillips, an Arlington Roe executive vice president. “Some go back three years and some go back five years.”

Property and casualty insurance typically has been a losing proposition for insurers, just not this bad. That’s why consumers mostly see television commercials for auto insurance, which traditionally is a money-maker.

The bottom line: Homeowners’ insurance shouldn’t be unattainable; it just might cost more.

“It’s pretty ugly right now,” Weaver said. “But nonetheless, we have so many companies [we represent], we can find something for somebody.”•


  • Interesting
    Got off the phone with State Farm this morning. What they told this reporter does not match what was told to me. SF said they are trying to move ALL customers to 1% deductible.
  • Rate Increases
    I have been an Insurance Agent for 12 years and although weather related claims have had the largest impact on Homeowners Insurance premiums... another factor that is on the rise is the number of fraud related claims. Just remember back to the south side house explosion. The Insurance Carriers that paid out on those losses will see that factored into their claims ratios. And to take it one step further - Homeowners Insurance policies have become so open peril that almost everything is covered. Home Insurance was ORIGINALLY written to cover against the 3 basic perils: fire, wind, and hail. Now look at everything a policy affords coverage for. I have a feeling within the next 10 years the Insurance Industry will redesign the Homeowners product and take it back to it's more original design of affording coverage for major catastrophic losses only. I've heard Industry rumor in past years where it's in the works but no company wants to step out on the limb first to redesign the product.
  • State Farm
    I had a weather related claim on State Farm last year and they upped me to the 1% deductible (prior basement flood claims). I've had 3 claims in 17 years and none would of exceeded the 1%. Some good news my premium went down. By the way I checked and since I had 2 claims in last 5 years other agencies prices were even more.
  • middle class
    ". . . can the middle class win on anything these days?" No.
  • Erie or Travelers
    Robb - Surprised that State Farm is that competative. I used to have them, but switched to Erie, then eventually to travelers. Both were better than State Farm, especially when bundling an auto policy with a home owners. That being said, I'll be watching my mail for any changes to my home owner's policy.
  • There's possibly more to this?
    My State Farm homeowner's premium jumped 20% this year, without me having made any changes. I did shop around some and the quotes were similar. I guess I'm fairly surprised that the story says premiums aren't going up... That's not my experience. But now I'll definitely be comparing this year's renewal terms as opposed to last year's. :-/ It's so frustrating... can the middle class win on anything these days?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Choice between a democrat and a question mark? Take the question mark. We have all seen what the democrats will do.

    2. Its easy to blame workers. What about the Management of the Mill. Its not smart in business to not have a back up plan. Workers are afforded sick days in most cases. Union or not. Whether drunk partying, or a real sickness. Why would you as a businessman/woman not have a rotation of workers incase this happens. This is not an exclusive union protection. If the company can prove bad intentions on the part of any union employee. They can take action. Most CBA's have a 3 strike policy. Just like most Non-union company policies. You should read a CBA sometime. There are protections for companies too. Unions understand that businesses need to make money. If they don't, the union's member won't have a place to work.

    3. My kids play hockey on the North side and we have been very happy with the youth program. More Ice would create more opportunity for kids to pay this great sport. With 3 rinks that would also create more figure skating opportunities. What better gift to give your kids than a sport they will love!

    4. Naah, only Indy place fans were robbed of seeing Zanardi race. CART fans saw his amazing talents just about every weekend. And F1 fans saw him too. Zanardi didn't care he wasn't at Indy, neither do 99.18% of other race fans world wide. And CART fans are quite pleased of the domination of their drivers and owners have had at Indy, in the IRL, and in the current Indycar series....almost 99.18% of the time since 2000 Indy 500. I respect Zanardi, but his life goes on without Indy. Sucks to be you Capt.

    5. So let me get this right: gun permits online are fraud proof, but voting is as easy as 1-2-3.--But at least we agree that someone without a photo ID cannot be trusted with a gun.