IBJNews

Home-sale agreements continue disappointing trend

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Real estate agency F.C. Tucker Co. Inc. said Monday morning that home-sale agreements in central Indiana sank 22.8 percent in February, compared with the same month last year. That marks the sixth straight month of year-over-year declines, dating back to September.

February's slide was only a slight improvement from the 31-percent fall recorded in January.

Buyers in the nine-county area in February signed agreements for 1,784 homes, down 527 from February 2013.

In Marion County, agreements fell 20.2 percent, to 760. Hamilton County experienced one of the steepest drops in the area, 30.3 percent, to 354 agreements.

In Johnson County, agreements decreased 19.1 percent, to 165. Hendricks County experienced a much more severe drop, 31.3 percent, as agreements tumbled to 156.

Boone County saw the biggest decrease, 39.5 percent, but recorded only 52 agreements.

Inventory in the nine-county area continued to fall. The number of homes on the market in February dipped 12 percent, to 9,229, from the year-ago period.

F.C. Tucker President Jim Litten attributed the disappointing numbers to the prolonged wintery weather conditions but hoped for a turnaround as spring approaches.

Higher mortgage rates and tighter inventories also have contributed to the weaker numbers.

On a more positive note, the average year-to-date sale price in the area rose 7.2 percent, to $155,886, compared with February 2013. The average price for Marion County homes was up 5.9 percent, to $117,757. The average Hamilton County price jumped 7.6 percent to $252,643.

One central Indiana home that sold in February was priced above $2 million, and four fetched between $1 million and $2 million. Fifty-three were priced between $500,000 and $1 million.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • $7 jobs
    $7/hour jobs are not intended for homebuyers. Less than 8% of people working minimum wage jobs are the primary earner, and over 75% of them are teenagers who live at home. That's real data.
  • Home Sales & Snow
    Sorry, people just don't buy homes when it's crappy snowy, cold weather. They also don't list their homes for sale because people know that noone is going to buy it in this weather. This number is so skewed, it's not even funny.
  • The Color is Green
    Home sales are down. Wages are down. $7 per hour jobs do not create home buyers Duh

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

    2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

    3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

    4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

    5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

    ADVERTISEMENT