Hoosier politicians offer tax cuts for all stripes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When it comes to putting money back in taxpayers' pockets, not all tax cuts are the same.

Hoosiers have a pick of candidates looking to succeed Gov. Mitch Daniels who are ready to slash their taxes for them. Republican Mike Pence has proposed cutting the state's personal income tax by 10 percent, and Democrat John Gregg wants to eliminate the state's sales gasoline tax and the corporate income tax for companies with physical headquarters in Indiana.

There's no doubt that just about every Hoosier politician wants to cut state taxes.

"Past some point of safety, it's better to leave the money with the taxpayer who earned it than let it burn a hole in the pocket of government," Daniels said before setting off on a motorcycle rally from the Statehouse. The comment won him plenty of applause from assembled motorcyclists joining Daniels for his "last roundup" as governor on a ride to French Lick.

Workers commuting between Indianapolis' doughnut counties and downtown Indy might get more out of Gregg's proposal if they earn around $50,000 a year and drive an SUV. Make that commuter a lawyer in a Toyota Prius and the Pence plan starts to look more appealing.

Analysts with the liberal group The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy weighed in on Pence's plan last week, saying it would give more money back to richer Hoosiers. (Someone earning $250,000 a year will obviously get back more money from an income tax cut than someone earning $40,000.)

That prompted Gregg to blast the Pence measure as a handout for the wealthy.

"Any proposed tax cut should be fair to all Hoosiers, while also improving Indiana as a place to live and work," Gregg spokesman Daniel Altman wrote in an emailed response to questions. "That is why John has proposed tax cuts that will benefit all Hoosiers, ease the pain at the pump, spur job creation and help middle class families offset the costs of daycare."

The Pence team, relying on information from The Tax Foundation, a conservative group, points out that on the surface it may seem like anyone earning six figures is well-off, but many small businesses file using the income tax, rather than incorporating. Therefore, Pence says, cutting the income tax would help both workers and business owners.

"Mike Pence's proposed tax cut is pro-taxpayer and pro-business," Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault said in an email. "Mike's plan increases take-home pay for Hoosiers and provides permanent relief for our small businesses."

If this sounds achingly like the presidential battle being waged between President Barack Obama and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and the split between Congressional Democrats and Republicans, it should. It's almost an exact mirror of the wars being waged in Washington.

Democrats, like Gregg, say taxes should be "fair," while Republicans, like Pence, say taxes are an ailment that calls for "relief." Congressional Democrats balk at extending the Bush-era tax cuts for anyone making more than $250,000 a year, while Republicans accuse them of killing jobs.

Indiana candidates just tend to be more genial.

There's been no lack of tax-cutting in Indiana over the last few years. Lawmakers approved a phase-out of the state's inheritance tax earlier this year and a large cut in the corporate income tax last year.

They also put in place new controls to either trigger refunds if the state accumulates enough money, as is the case with Daniels' automatic tax refund, or limit how much property taxes can be raised (though they paid for the latter measure with a hike in the state sales tax).

The numbers can be eye-numbing, but the principles are simple.

Consumption taxes, like the sales tax and gas tax, place more of the cost of government on poorer residents. Liberals, meanwhile, hold up the income tax — and, increasingly, taxes on investments, like the capital gains tax — as a means for redistributing wealth.

In November, there will be a choice for just about everyone depending on who they think should pay for things like education and roads.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1