Hot apartment market sees robust sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gene B. Glick Co.’s Aug. 30 purchase of the 240-unit Thompson Village apartment complex on the south side is the most recent deal in a year full of transactions that reflect robust activity in the apartment market, where buyers are attracted by rising occupancy and rental rates and low borrowing costs.

Through August of this year, 26 properties representing more than 5,500 apartment units have sold in the metro area, according to Tikijian Associates, a local apartment brokerage. That’s a 190-percent jump in properties sold compared with the first eight months of 2010, when nine properties representing more than 2,400 units changed hands.

Buyers in the sector have had no trouble finding deals.

“There are still a lot of troubled properties, so there is a continuous supply of lender properties coming to market,” said George Tikijian III, senior managing director of Tikijian Associates. Demand is so strong, he said, that increasing numbers of private investors are selling properties as well.

Tikijian said apartments are attractive as a hedge against inflation, which some economists see as a significant threat in the next few years. Because apartment leases are only for a year, rates can be adjusted frequently to compensate for inflation.
Duke Hardy, an associate of Tikijian’s, said apartment buyers have become especially aggressive since the Federal Reserve committed earlier this summer to keep interest rates low into 2013. He said buyers are more willing to close without permanent financing because they’re confident they’ll have time to lock in low rates later.

Some buyers are offering non-refundable earnest money as soon as they put a property under contract, Hardy said. Typically, earnest money is refundable until certain due diligence takes place. “We didn’t even see that during the ‘boom’ days leading up to the financial crisis,” Hardy said.

Tikijian said the Indianapolis market is attracting high-net-worth investors who have been priced out of what are typically the hottest markets—the Northeast and the West Coast. When they look for alternatives to those markets, they look here, he said, because both the city and state have a reputation for having stable, diversified economies.

Not that the demand hasn’t put upward pressure on prices here. Tikijian said prices are up 10 to 15 percent over a year ago.

Those prices are driven in part by rising occupancy and rents, as the apartment market benefits from the depressed single-family home market.

Alex Stokely, vice president of local apartment owner/manager Barrett & Stokely, said occupancy for his company’s portfolio of properties is in the mid-90-percent range, up four to five percent from a year ago. The company owns or manages 50 properties representing about 11,000 units. Rents are up between two and four percent so far this year, which he said is stronger growth than any year in recent memory.
The downtown market is especially strong. Occupancy at Riley Towers, a high-rise complex that Barrett & Stokely manages, is 97 percent, the highest it’s been in more than 10 years, Stokely said.

Numbers like those validate the expansion strategy adopted a few years ago by Glick, a local company with a long history in the apartment sector.

The company, founded here in 1947, owns or manages about 19,000 apartment units in 10 states. The company began ramping up its long-dormant development and acquisition activity back in 2008, when a new generation of leadership took over.

By the end of the year it will have added 2,000 units, primarily through acquisition, since that strategy began, said David Barrett, who became CEO in 2008.

It recently bought Thompson Village from Embassy Group, a New York investor that bought the complex from locally based Pedcor in 2006 for significantly less than the $10.2 million it listed for this year. What Glick paid for it hasn’t been disclosed.

The complex, near Thompson Road and State Road 135, was built in 1989, and its one- and two-bedroom units are about 95-percent occupied.

Barrett said Glick expects to close several more acquisitions by the end of the year.

“It’s a very exciting time for our business,” he said, noting that a combination of rent growth and low interest rates provides opportunities for both acquisitions and development.

But with so much demand, “it’s a seller’s market,” he said. “The art is getting a good deal and not overpaying for it.”



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.